Skeptic Project

Your #1 COINTELPRO cognitive infiltration source.

Page By Category

Forum - Socialism preferred over Tea Baggers

Tags: MOONBATTERY [ Add Tags ]

[ Return to General Discussion | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 18:57
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original
#1 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 19:02
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

FireDogLake being intellectually dishonest as usual.

They're making it sound like people were asked "What do you like better: Teabaggers or Russia?"

They weren't. In typical moonbat fashion, FDL is being dishonest. They are conflating two entirely separate polls, with different people being polled in each, in order to form a narrative.

This is why Democrats call FireDogLakers "Firebaggers." Because they're just as stupid, ideological and dishonest as the Teabaggers. This is total bullshit.

#2 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 19:04
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

Hmm, okay. Well, thanks for letting me know. I've only been on FDL once or twice, but someone was talking to me about it on skype, I googled it and this is what came up top. How do you know it's two separate polls?

EDIT: doesn't matter, worked it out.

#3 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 19:07
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

I'm sure it will spread on moonbat sites just as fast as the bullshit I posted about SCOTUS did on wingnut* sites.

*Deal with it Brenton ;P

#4 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 19:10
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

Hmmm, well, doubt it. It's already been out 3 days. Granted, every bit of me hopes that socialism is preferred over the tea parties.

#5 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 19:11
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Neither one are worth a damn.

#6 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 19:13
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

Well, Socialism is only like the basis of modern society but whatever...

#7 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 19:14
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

How do you figure that?

#8 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Inside JobPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 19:22
(0)
 

Level: 2
CS Original

So I'll take it, NWO Florist, that you don't agree with government bail outs or obamacare?

#9 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 19:24
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Government bailouts worked.

There's no such thing as Obamacare.

#10 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 19:25
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

Parliamentary Democracy is... kinda socialist honey.

#11 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Inside JobPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 19:26
(0)
 

Level: 2
CS Original

Sorry, universal health care.

I know it worked. It is socialism.

#12 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 19:40
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

"Parliamentary Democracy is... kinda socialist honey."

Grossly oversimplified. And the United States is a representative democracy, not parliamentary.

"Sorry, universal health care."

I don't think you know much about the healthcare bill Nic. There is no universal healthcare. So fail.

"I know it worked. It is socialism."

I'd like to see you support such an absurd statement.

#13 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
MuertosPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 19:48
(0)
 

Paid Disinformation Blogger

Level: 14
CS Original

Well, Socialism is only like the basis of modern society but whatever...

Totally untrue. Unless your definition of "socialism" is way, WAYYYYYY broader than, say, how real socialists define it.

#14 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 19:56
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

My definition of socialism would be that anything which results in power/influence for the lower classes is ... socialist (or, it can be oppositely defined when it's used by dictators/etc). In traditional Capitalism you either go without those things, or climb the ladder - in an increasingly socialist society you get those things no matter what rung of the ladder you stand on.

"Parliamentary Democracy is... kinda socialist honey."

Grossly oversimplified. And the United States is a representative democracy, not parliamentary.

Well I didn't say I was talking about the US, but the modern world.

#15 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Inside JobPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 19:57
(0)
 

Level: 2
CS Original

You're right, I don't. As my country's health care system has been far better for far longer. Still doesn't stop it from being socialism.

Government bails outs are how privately own companies nationalise their losses.

(Facepalm) please use wikipedia Brenton

#16 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
MuertosPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 20:00
(0)
 

Paid Disinformation Blogger

Level: 14
CS Original

My definition of socialism would be that anything which results in power/influence for the lower classes is ... socialist.

I think that definition is a fundamental misunderstanding of what socialism really is.

#17 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 20:03
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

Well, Socialism is a political theory based on creating a culture where the institutions of society are to exist for the common good of all - so any institution that does that is socialist, at least in a very light way in terms of it's behaviour. I'll grant that an organisation can behave in a socialist manner without necessarily identifying directly with socialism.

#18 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
The Real RoxettePosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 20:05
(0)
 

There ARE more sluts in public schools. Shut up and let me explain.

Level: 8
CS Original

That's egalitarianism, not socialism.

#19 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
MuertosPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 20:09
(0)
 

Paid Disinformation Blogger

Level: 14
CS Original

Well, Socialism is a political theory based on creating a culture where the institutions of society are to exist for the common good of all...

That also describes fascism. In fact I doubt there has been a political theory on earth that wasn't premised on the idea that whatever the theory is will create a culture for the common good of all. Very poor definition, IMO.

#20 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 20:13
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

You're kind of misinterpreting what I'm saying. I'm not saying 'when a cultural institution claims to exist for the good of all, therefore it does and therefore it is socialist'. I'm saying that when an institution behaves in accordance with that socialist ideal or continually strives toward it (even if it is not recognised as socialist), it then is socialist.

For example in traditional Capitalism and past cultures, it was typical that only certain individuals were deserving of the vote - a society is increasingly socialist, or behaving in an increasingly socialist manner, when the society has a long-standing track-record of giving all individuals the vote.

#21 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Inside JobPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 20:14
(0)
 

Level: 2
CS Original

I thought the definition of a word was fixed. I didn't realise you could change the definition of a word to suit your own interpretation. Awesome!!!

#22 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 20:17
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

I don't see how I'm changing it, though do please elaborate. I'm sticking to the most basic idea of socialism which is supposed to be equality for all.

#23 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 20:19
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Brenton, as explained to you in the other thread, you can't just change the meaning of shit when you're wrong about something.

"You're right, I don't. As my country's health care system has been far better for far longer. Still doesn't stop it from being socialism."

I have no idea what you're trying to say. You can't just throw around isms.

#24 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Inside JobPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 20:25
(0)
 

Level: 2
CS Original

Brenton, like I said, wikipedia.

Matt, I was agreeing that I do not know that much about Obama's healhcare bill. From what I could tell it is the government guaranteeing that those that can't afford health care will have the bill picked up by the government. Am I close?

How about I start throwing some jism around?

#25 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 20:27
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

"Am I close?"

No. And it's not "Obama's bill." Its the product of many peoples' work and many compromises.

"Am I close?"

No.

"How about I start throwing some jism around?"

You seemed to be saying something was still socialism. I have no idea what you're talking about.

#26 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 20:28
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

I don't need to Wikipedia anything. This is a completely different discussion than the Nazi-Socialist discussion because we're not talking about proving correlation between something, we're talking about the most basic definition of Socialism which if you were to Wikipedia yourself you'd realise I'm dead right on.

#27 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 20:30
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Brenton stop trolling.

#28 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 20:31
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

Matt, shove this post up your ass.

#29 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 20, 2011 - 20:34
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

You're pretty feisty for a she-male.

#30 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]