Skeptic Project

Bizarre. Just bizarre.

Going through here and reading all this, I can't help but wonder out of all of the posts on anticultist, zeitgeistmovements, and of course our forum, he chose to come back now. Surely, if he were telling the truth and we were lying, he would just ignore it like all of our other apparent "lies." I think the truth is he's busted himself so badly and jeopardized his position to try to take over TZM and feel really important, that he had to come "defend" himself.

It was ignored before, but I'll mention it: why did you and "Roxanne" have the same IP Address? Even posts can be edited, on wordpress.com you can't go in and fake IP addresses. So even if anticultist and everyone else is lying about your under-the-table dealings, you're still full of shit for trying to pretend to be Roxanne, so why should anyone give you the benefit of the doubt?

"You were banned from that group you dimwit, you were caught cheating in your position of power as well, fuck me man you are bad at this."

I was banned from that independently run message board. (I.E. not run by anyone official in the organization.) I have never been caught cheating in any position of power. This is really making me laugh. And further proving my point about confirmation bias.

Again. You all look like idiots.

Just an FYI, you can see on our actual website here: http://www.kanar.org/?page_id=29 me listed on the playmaster staff. Which is one of the higher ranking rules enforcement positions. You cannot hold this position if you have ever been convicted of cheating in our organization.

Man, YOU are bad at this. :)

And yes, I posted for Roxanne.

Neil thats not even the same kanar group. Thats like saying you can not be president of America if you are caught cheating [thems the type of claims you are trying to make here].

Heres where you were caught lieing and cheating and banned:

http://kanartalk3306.yuku.com/topic/2397?page=2

Heres where you are claiming innocence:

http://www.kanar.org/?page_id=29

Seperate places and incidents, you are really bad at this.

You were caught lying and cheating, just because a few of your buddies protect you and decide you didnt does not mean the people who witnessed it made it all up.

You lose.

Anti-cultist, you just kind of proved my point.

The first link is to an independently run message board.

The second link is to the actual official site for Kanar, the LARP I play.

In other words, the first link you gave goes to a message board that is not used as an official communication medium for the organization at all. People were free to say whatever they wanted and the moderation was next to non-existent. The second link you gave is to the official website, and it lists me on the playmaster staff.

So now you have invented the theory that I was part of two LARP groups called Kanar based out of Milan Michigan and was banned from one of them?

Seriously man. Look at yourself.
This gets more and more laughable with every post! :)

"You were caught lying and cheating, just because a few of your buddies protect you and decide you didnt does not mean the people who witnessed it made it all up.

You lose."

More theories you just made up on the spot. During most of my time at Kanar my friends were not on the marshal staff. There is no way they could of protected me. And in some instances the marshals investigating were actually not friends at all. Again, you make a baseless claim. Can you PROVE that the only reason I was never prosecuted is because of bias on the part of the people investigating? No. You can't. You just made up that theory right here on the spot. Because apparently your views of the motivations of people you don't even know MUST be spot on right?

Uh, dipshit you said:

"Neil thats not even the same kanar group."

Which is you implying that they are therefore not the same group. And that I was banned from one. Which I was not.

"But thats not the important thing, the important thing is you were caught lying and cheating by these people and thats the bottom line."

If they could of proven that they caught me lying or cheating, I would of been prosecuted for it. And that is the bottom line.

@JimJesus

"The only thing I seen you crush is a bag of Cheetos and your credibility. Your responses are nothing short of laughable. You're not here to convince us, you're here to spread your shit little lies that you have your listeners by then you come on here to say them. When we laugh at how stupid you are for saying it even with the overwhelming evidence against you, you can just claim you won because we called you a fat tub of lying shit.

So you did 'win', but you're still a lying, cheating sack of shit."

That's just it. There is no mountain of evidence. Though you are right, I am not here to convince you. I am here to expose you. And that is actually going quite well for me. :) Do you think at the end of the day I care one ioata about what any of you think of me? This is for the people reading this, and my own amusement. Poking holes in the toilet paper that is your "evidence" has been child's play.

Neil, we piled evidence in here. YOu just lied and denied it. We can see it with our own eyes. We watch your behavior and it's consistent. What's inconsistent are your excuses.

Neil can't afford Cheetos, quit playin'.

Maybe generic cheese puffs.

Also I'm not going to bother trying to convince a holocaust denier that the holocaust happened because he has other reasons for saying it's not real. Your credibility is your source of income, and we exposed it. Of course you're going to defend and deny because it keeps the bill collectors at bay.

"Neil, we piled evidence in here. YOu just lied and denied it. We can see it with our own eyes. We watch your behavior and it's consistent. What's inconsistent are your excuses."

In order for you to prove something, you have to have evidence.

Linking a message board where people said I lied, does not make me a liar.

Linking a message board where people said I cheated, does not make me a cheater.

Me posting a link that proves that I am in fact a trusted member of the organization in question, and appointed to a position of authority that you cannot even hold if you are guilty of the allegations against me, is evidence that you are wrong.

Me pointing out that I have never been convicted of cheating or lying about anything in my 12 year history of participating in that organization is evidence you are wrong.

People in a position to actually investigate the allegations against me reviewed me and found me innocent.

Now, you can make up another theory that it must mean they (the people investigating) were my friends, or that they were wrong or whatever but that also would not be evidence, it would be conjecture on your part.

Please refute this. I want to hear how I am wrong about this specific point. :)

LIAR

No. I continued posting because it became fun.

Now, back to the point here fellas. I am enjoying watching you squirm. :)

"Neil, we piled evidence in here. YOu just lied and denied it. We can see it with our own eyes. We watch your behavior and it's consistent. What's inconsistent are your excuses."

In order for you to prove something, you have to have evidence.

Linking a message board where people said I lied, does not make me a liar.

Linking a message board where people said I cheated, does not make me a cheater.

Me posting a link that proves that I am in fact a trusted member of the organization in question, and appointed to a position of authority that you cannot even hold if you are guilty of the allegations against me, is evidence that you are wrong.

Me pointing out that I have never been convicted of cheating or lying about anything in my 12 year history of participating in that organization is evidence you are wrong.

People in a position to actually investigate the allegations against me reviewed me and found me innocent.

Now, you can make up another theory that it must mean they (the people investigating) were my friends, or that they were wrong or whatever but that also would not be evidence, it would be conjecture on your part.

Please refute this. I want to hear how I am wrong about this specific point. :)