Skeptic Project

Your #1 COINTELPRO cognitive infiltration source.

Page By Category

Forum - VTV goes where even CS won't: he exposes Merola's parents - Page 3

Tags: Beached whales flip flop too, VTV, who added all these stupid tags?, VTV is fat and poor, MAKE IT STOP, THESE TAGS ARE AD HOMONIDS, VTV caught redhanded trolling, VTV exposing Merolas family information, VTV caught lieing, VTV has a TItan dildo in his ass, VTV is white trash, VTV shows his ugly face on CS again, VTV failing to squirm his fat ass out of this, VTV: master of the moving goalposts, FLIPPY FLOP!!!!, VTV types a lot but doesn't say much, VTV needs HARD CHISELED SPOCK, lips that could suck a golfball through a straw, TWINKIE TITS HUMBLED BY THE CHINAMAN, MOOBS, WOMEN ON STEROIDS, VTV - EVIDENCE WILL NEVER BE GOOD ENOUGH !!!, VTV buys cartoons with donations, VTV needs to shut the fuck up, Everyone added these tags. Also, you're fat and poor VTV., Omni-Science made these awesome tags, And yeah, I posted that one myself. GFY, VTV sucking Titan Dildo dick, FLIP FLOP, DO THE FLIP FLOP!, FAIL WHITE TRASH IS FAIL, VTV - is too stupid to see whats happening, VTV- Trollz himself LOL, 2012 pwnd VTV, VTV stop posting the same thing repeatedly, VTV doing logic gymnastics, youtube is not research, even white trash hates VTV [ Add Tags ]

This forum thread is currently locked, no new replies or edits can be made.

[ Return to Topic Ritz-Carlton | Reply to Topic ]
JimJesusPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:22
(0)
 

Bacon Pancakes! Making Bacon Pancakes, take some Bacon and I'll put it in a Pancake! Bacon Pancakes that's what it's gonna make...Bacon Pancaaaaaake!! ♪

Level: 3

Does WordPress give you an e-mail when you get a comment?

#61 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Caramel ColorPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:25
(0)
 

hey sailor

Level: 1
CS Original

by default I think so (mine does) but I think you can turn it off

#62 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
VTVPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:25
(-1)
 

Level: 1
CS Original

Again, it comes to motive.

There is no benefit for me doing this.

All James had to do was click "edit". And make those posts say that.

There is huge motive for James to do so.

There is no motive for me to post Peter's personal information on James Kush's blog. You will note in his pictures the dates of the two posts in question are edited out? Yet he left the last one?

I gave you the information. You can continue to spread the lie if you want. But Peter knows better. And so do the people who actually matter. The users of this website not being on that list.

#63 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:25
(1)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

You're claiming that James Kush logged into anticultist's blog and edited comments to implicate you? That is just beyond bizarre. VTV, you need help man.

#64 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
anticultistPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:28
(1)
 

Brainwashing you for money

Level: 15
CS Original

Well perhaps if James Kush posts the images without all the editing on them we can see the dates and if the comments are in fact edited, or even if he lets a third party like Matt log in to check.

That way we will know if VTV's claims that James has editied the comments is true or not.

I am willing to give VTV benefit of the doubt as the comment could have been edited on James's blogs, but if James proves it not to have been, then VTV will have been destroyed.

#65 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Caramel ColorPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:29
(1)
 

hey sailor

Level: 1
CS Original

You have zero motive to do something like that? because releasing said information believing we'd run with it and tell the world and make ourselves look bad isn't reason enough?

ok

#66 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:30
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

I'm going to go out on a limb here and assume anticultist has never given James Kush the login and password to his blog.

Am I correct in that assumption anticultist?

Because if so, how could James Kush login to anticultist's blog and edit posts?

#67 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
anticultistPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:32
(0)
 

Brainwashing you for money

Level: 15
CS Original

James has never logged into my account or has ever had the ability.

What I think VTV is implying is that James Kush has edited the content of the post VTV made on his blog to post Merolas family details as opposed to what was in the original message.

This would show up as an edited message in his blog account though I believe so it should be really easy to verify.

#68 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:33
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Also, even if James Kush did login to anticultist's blog and edited comments, it would not change the IP address of the user who originally posted the comment, would it? Wouldn't it just change the comment itself?

#69 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
VTVPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:34
(0)
 

Level: 1
CS Original

No Matt.

I am saying that James Kush could of easily edited my comments on his own blog. They are both word press blogs.

I am astonished sometimes at the sheer lack of critical thinking skills in people here sometimes.

Anti-cultist's blog is only relevant because it is being used as evidence that the posts on James Kush's blog come from the same IP address.

I have posted on both blogs in the past.

So all James had to do was edit my comments. Which is pretty obviously what he did.

One of the things Brittany pointed out about you guys to me that really rang true was the fact that you do not apply the same scrutiny to your own assessments of people and their motives that you demand that conspiracy theorists should. In other words, you have all the same confirmation bias towards anything that makes the people you are trolling look bad in the same way that some fanatical truthers have about the government.

If you want to go on believing that for some reason I would help James Kush get information on Peter's family, and would do so publicly rather then anonymously that is up to you. However I find your judgement seriously in question.

James Kush recently made a blog where he blatantly lied about the relationship between Exemplar Zero and the Venus Project in an effort to cause more strife between the Zeitgeist Movement and the Venus Project.

He is putting up this hoax for the purpose of trying to drive a wedge between myself and Peter.

He failed.

You can (and will) believe whatever you want. Fortunately as I pointed out, Peter knows better, TZM knows better, and that is really all that matters.

And no. I am not implying James Kush logged into Anti-cultist's blog. The comments were not even made there.

This is just further proving how little some of you people think when you are fishing for something negative about someone you are trolling.

#70 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:37
(1)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Well, then I guess the only way to verify this would be for an outside party to log into James Kush's blog and see for themselves.

I'm willing to do that.

I don't think its necessary though. Lack of critical thinking skills, huh? Yeah sure, you fat shitbag.

#71 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
anticultistPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:37
(1)
 

Brainwashing you for money

Level: 15
CS Original

Read my post above Neil and you will see that does not apply because I have actually seen what you have said and given you benefit of doubt. James may well have edited the posts you made on his blog, but that is now for James to prove.

If he proves he has not then you are left looking pretty fucking stupid

#72 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Kaiser FalknerPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:37
(0)
 

HAIL HYDRA

Level: 6
CS Original

[Late to the party]

#73 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Caramel ColorPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:38
(0)
 

hey sailor

Level: 1
CS Original

hey vtv, since you're sticking with the "they were edited!" defense, what did the posts originally say?

and for the record, edited comments retain the same ip address as who originally made the comment. GO WORDPRESS!

actually it sucks

#74 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
VTVPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:40
(0)
 

Level: 1
CS Original

Also, I find it highly unlikely that James is going to let any of you log into his blog. If he provides screen shots of the comments without "edited" next to them that would be a simple matter for him to fake.

Not that I would trust any of you to verify it even if he let you log in anyway.

#75 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
JimJesusPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:40
(0)
 

Bacon Pancakes! Making Bacon Pancakes, take some Bacon and I'll put it in a Pancake! Bacon Pancakes that's what it's gonna make...Bacon Pancaaaaaake!! ♪

Level: 3

"There is no benefit for me doing this."

I couldn't disagree more. You'd love to see Mario and Kush fade away and not exposing you. So if you could get them to post those comments, or use those links to dox PJ's family, you have effectively demonstrated his malevolence, thus rendering his further arguments suspect.

Motive has long been established.

Now there could be some speculation around your relationship with Peter given the public outcry to have you removed as a moderator. It could be that he removed your show from the list on TZM's page. I don't know. What is clear, is you have tried to find a way to discredit Kush and Mario for some time. Obsessed with it, IMHO.

#76 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:42
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

"Not that I would trust any of you to verify it even if he let you log in anyway."

You know what the benefit of being a raging asshole who doesn't care what people think is?

I don't need to lie.

#77 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
VTVPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:43
(0)
 

Level: 1
CS Original

@Carmel:

"hey vtv, since you're sticking with the "they were edited!" defense, what did the posts originally say?

and for the record, edited comments retain the same ip address as who originally made the comment. GO WORDPRESS!

actually it sucks"

I don't even remember. That was months and months ago. I believe it was in response to something he said in that blog. I don't even remember the topic anymore. However your point above further proves my point. And that is that if he decided to edit my posts they would in fact have the same IP address as they did when I posted them.

And yes Matt, lack of critical thinking skill son your part. I had to hold your hand through this whole process. For someone who thinks so highly of himself you are sure are an idiot at times.

#78 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:43
(1)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Yeah but you're unemployed and live in a trailer.

#79 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
JimJesusPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:44
(0)
 

Bacon Pancakes! Making Bacon Pancakes, take some Bacon and I'll put it in a Pancake! Bacon Pancakes that's what it's gonna make...Bacon Pancaaaaaake!! ♪

Level: 3

I also find it hilarious that you pre-debunked all evidence before it has even come out because James Kush is giving it and he's always wrong/dishonest. Poisoning the well?

#80 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Kaiser FalknerPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:44
(1)
 

HAIL HYDRA

Level: 6
CS Original

There needs to be proof of editing, not circumstantial evidence. Perhaps a cache of the website from the time before the alleged comment editing?

#81 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
anticultistPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:44
(0)
 

Brainwashing you for money

Level: 15
CS Original

Yeah Neil has tried the same tactics on me in the past he failed miserably, hes even tried to say I am responsible for other shit which I have no time to do even if I had the inclination.

I know Neil has incentive and motive to defame James Kush and Mario thats a fact, in fact just look at his list of 'enemies' on TZM forum, that in itself speaks loud and clear his methods.

I also understand that Kush and Mario would have reason to humiliate abd defame VTV in the same manner, so in this case neither of them get my vote, I just know I dont trust VTV in the slightest he is a known liar already.

#82 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
VTVPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:47
(0)
 

Level: 1
CS Original

"I couldn't disagree more. You'd love to see Mario and Kush fade away and not exposing you. So if you could get them to post those comments, or use those links to dox PJ's family, you have effectively demonstrated his malevolence, thus rendering his further arguments suspect.

Motive has long been established.

Now there could be some speculation around your relationship with Peter given the public outcry to have you removed as a moderator. It could be that he removed your show from the list on TZM's page. I don't know. What is clear, is you have tried to find a way to discredit Kush and Mario for some time. Obsessed with it, IMHO."

Jim, whoever you are. If you looked at the amount of time Mario and James put into their blogs, and if you looked at the already exposed lies both of them have spread I would say there is a lot more evidence for obsession on the their part then mine. When someone lies about us, yes, I feel inclined to correct them.

Maybe you should ask yourself what possibly could motive them to put as much effort as they do into making youtube videos, blog posts, etc?

Nothing mentally irregular about me choosing to clear the air.

It's plenty irregular to behave as Mario and Kush do.

#83 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Caramel ColorPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:48
(0)
 

hey sailor

Level: 1
CS Original

"Now there could be some speculation around your relationship with Peter given the public outcry to have you removed as a moderator. It could be that he removed your show from the list on TZM's page. "

ding ding ding. this is what i'm thinking. he's either trying to get back into peter's life or trying to take petty revenge on him thinking he could just blame it on someone else. and kill two birds with one stone, thinking we'd run with the info and make us look like assholes. if this were a lie, why would he be here of all places defending himself? why would he care what we think? you got called out, son. face it.

#84 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
VTVPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:48
(0)
 

Level: 1
CS Original

Anti-cultist can you please provide evidence for me being a "known liar"?

#85 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Kaiser FalknerPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:49
(0)
 

HAIL HYDRA

Level: 6
CS Original

does anyone have the website where the original posts are supposed to be? It should be easy enough to go back in the history and look for discrepancies, if they do in fact exist

#86 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:49
(1)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

You have a track record of lying Neil. I read your old LARP forum awhile back. You know, where you got busted for cheating and lying?

Mario and Kush have a track record of being obsessed.

None of you are people I would want to associate with in Realworldistan, but the fact remains that you have a credibility problem.

#87 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
anticultistPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:50
(1)
 

Brainwashing you for money

Level: 15
CS Original

Your old LARP forum should about do that job I think Neil we have been over this topic with you in the past. And you were also banned from the Ron Paul forum for lieing there remember?

You created accounts, trolled, made shit up, lied about things to your Larp buddies.

#88 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Omni-SciencePosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:52
(0)
 

Ordo Ab Chao.

Level: 8
CS Original

I'm getting such a fucking laugh watching Fat Fuck VTV try to squirm his fat ass out of this.

This thread is full of WIN.

#89 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
VTVPosted: May 14, 2011 - 13:53
(0)
 

Level: 1
CS Original

"Now there could be some speculation around your relationship with Peter given the public outcry to have you removed as a moderator. It could be that he removed your show from the list on TZM's page. "

Two critical points.

1. Peter ignored the "public outcry" that was really just a few people acting like they were a lot of people. You will note I am still a moderator. What exactly would I have to gain from posting Peter's families information in that case? Would it make Peter more inclined to keep me as a moderator if I publicly posted his families information? That's comedy.

2. The posts in question (Who's dates are conveniently edited out of the screenshots by Kush) took place MONTHS ago. So now my motive would be to go back in time and post Peter's parents information in retaliation for something (Peter removing V-RADIO from the website) that had not even taken place yet?

Seriously. Do you guys actually even think about this stuff before you post it?

#90 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]