Skeptic Project

I think VTV's defense is going to be that Anticultist is lying, and is a troll. He's done it before and he'll do it again.

@alexastorm I think I pity him because I honestly do think VTV is disabled. In a audio record posted on the CS site about moderation problems within TZM which is of Danette Wallace talking to VTV and trying to get through to him about these problems. Wallace was basically talking to VTV like he is disabled. I began to think about it for a bit and it makes perfect sense why she talked to him like he is disabled because of course he is disabled.

I remember in that conversation with Danette Wallace on TS3 when Wallace brought up if their is a particular tone that one has to use when speaking to VTV or when VTV is just in the same channel as another. VTV responded by saying she's totally painting that in the wrong direction and goes on to say "if I was to look at you and say fuck you bitch and that was my answer. Would you find that to be a constructive answer". I can't help but think that VTV was in a way trying to indirectly insult Mrs. Wallace while attempting to to give a example which basically had nothing to do with her question at all.

Next in the conversation from what I remember someone was actually defending VTV saying such things as "VTV has a lot of pressure", and "It's clear that VTV is upset" and VTV responds to this person by saying "I'm not upset". Clearly VTV is upset yet he can't manage to say he is even in this case. Their is something obviously wrong with VTV which of course is that he is disabled.

When one talks to VTV they should talk to him like he is disabled because of course he is disabled. Something is wrong with the guy and he should seek professional help in my opinion.

I've spent a lot of my time over the past 25 years dealing with the disabled and in my personal experience I've never come across someone this low. Usually when something mean is done it's simply out of not knowing better, not malice. Now, since I'm no expert in the field I'll admit to the possibility but I don't think so. And even if he is, no excuse in this case. He's being calculative here, not common among the disabled. (again, in my experience) I really think he is one of the "entitlement people". I'm sure you've seen the type. They don't think that they need start at the bottom and work their way up, that they should just be handed a great position with high pay. They're jealous of people with nice, big houses and think said people have just had these things handed to them. (been accused of that by one of them) They don't get that people spend years working their asses off to reach that level. I've never changed my tone or manner of speech when talking to my son, his friends or classmates. But I do when I'm talking to someone that I consider to be a low life. I'd say there was a hell of a lot wrong with VTV, but nothing that he can't fix by growing the hell up and dumping the ridiculous ego.

Yeah I have personal details of Frescos family, Merolas family etc.. I researched everything and everyone years ago and never put them up on my blog. I could have openly put the entire family details and links online had I wanted to years ago. This was a rudimentary list of information I arrived at when doing some background searches on Peter Joseph, Jacque Fresco and Roxanne Meadows which was all available through legal investigation channels.

Yet even me the nasty evil critic of them didnt put this shit up in any public on line blogs, forums for others to see. The fact VTV was happy to expose Peters families facebook accounts [which I personally know give more information to use to search with] for critics to use and place on their forum is actually rather disturbing, it is a good job that James Kush has ethical guidelines.

This is really astonishing.

I'm sure VTV's response will be to shout "Troll!" as loud as possible and accuse everybody of lying. As Billl points out that's usually his response to anything.

The guy is out of control.

Basically he added anyone who is active on CS to the enemies list, whether they've actually done what he claims or not.

SURVEY SAYS:

I didn't do it Matt. And you are asking the question that basically explains the best evidence as to why I didn't.

http://forum.v-radio.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=154#p724

"As far as what happened next? Anti-cultist and James Kush both have access to an IP address. And with the right amount of photoshop could easily make all the "evidence" anyway they need it. I have posted on both of their blogs so it would not take much to cut and crop a few screenshots together. "

Theres your conspiracy theory right there.

Even though his IP is all over the posts on my blog staring me right in the face, and all the psts he has made on my blog are untouched. He has no legs to stand on and his imaginary photoshoppping bullshit is simply that...imagined.

I've got an idea anticultist.

Why don't you come on IRC, private message me the login and password to your blog. I can log in and look for myself at what IP address VTV posted under.

You can then change the password.

Why did he bring up Brittany Smith?

Thank you Matt, now he has to call you a liar. But you and me both know now I am telling the truth.

http://i55.tinypic.com/2jy3he.png" />

Neil is lying.

and here it is on my computer

One more thing. I never denied that I have posted on Anti-cultist and James Kush's blogs. That's not the point. The point is that when I posted there James could edit my post to say whatever he wants.

Let me ask you, how much do you believe what you preach when you have to lie to get your detractors discredited?

So Neil is claiming that James Kush edited his posts to say what they say now ?

Not that theyve been photoshopped ?

What will he claim next ?