Skeptic Project

VTV can you lick your own nipples?

Assimilated. That's a LOT of fat to assimilate.

And we can tell you how much of your WAKING hours you spend terrified of people calling you names. Every. Fucking. Second.

@2012 because now this is becoming funny again:

"@VTV No I won't. I suggest you look at the material I just suggested. It is a very clear that no one edited your blog post, and that people who suggest otherwise are often individuals with the intent on pushing their own agenda which in this case is "Someone edited your blog posts"."

It is not very clear. Kaiser stated the cache does not go back far enough to be sure. James Kush could of edited those posts immediately. There is no cache to find out if he did or not.

And as Paul Jones said:

"As much as I hate to do this, out of intellectual integrity and being an honest person I have to inform you that I have just carried out a series of tests on post editing on my blog.

I have concluded that the posts do not do any of the following when edited:

1: They do not mark themselves as having being edited
2: They do not change the date or the time after you edit them

Therefore VTV does has a fair point that we still can not 100% verify James Kush did not edit those comments."

Maybe you should do your own research before you start making comments like "It is very clear" that something happened. :)

VTV is stupefied. There's nothing in his post.

"I see 2012 has limped off after being defeated by the facts""

LOL!

@VTV Quite frankly. No. I was attempting to demonstrate for you how absurd the idea that Someone edited your post.

I do not trust you as a source when it comes to your successful rebuking all of the points. However, that aside I don't really care what happened before you got here. You had a agenda and decided to push so you participated in a debate here wherein you were going to emphatically prove that our idea was about someone did not edit your blog posts was not going to work for your agenda. So far you have failed to do this. And have instead proven that you don't understand the idea in the first place.

We have already given you evidence. We have provided links to a great deal of it and you are simply refusing to research it. Again, I am not going to spend hours re-typing every piece of information needed to present here for a single person to read who refuses to do the research himself before he makes grandiose claims that he can emphatically prove we are wrong about something he doesn't even understand.

Sigh....

There is science to back up a lot of what we say. There are also tons examples in this thread of no one editing your blog posts supported by academics in this thread. I have suggested you review the material and your refusing to do so.

We are suggesting a scientific approach to why no one edited your blog post as opposed to making up data to meet a agenda. That's all we have ever said it was.

Again, the material is all here. I suggest you read it. I am not going to re-type it for you. If you went through all the effort to make up that someone edited your blog post you can put some effort into studying what it is you claim to be able to emphatically prove wrong.

"I see 2012 has limped off after being defeated by the facts""

LOL!

Epic isnt it Matt, I laughed so hard at that

He is probably pulling out another legendary wall of text for us all, i cant wait.

Or he could always spam the misquote of mine again if he cant think of anything else to say.

Its ok though 2012 is eating him alive here.

I wonder if the stupid hurts him

LOL

"The fact is that you would never say anything like that to me if you ever met me. And would likely piss yourself if anyone you have victimized showed up at your door. Statistics tend to prove this:"

LOL

I walk around with a black sharpie so that just in case we ever meet, I can draw big cocks on your face.

@2012 because now this is becoming funny again:

"@VTV No I won't. I suggest you look at the material I just suggested. It is a very clear that no one edited your blog post, and that people who suggest otherwise are often individuals with the intent on pushing their own agenda which in this case is "Someone edited your blog posts"."

It is not very clear. Kaiser stated the cache does not go back far enough to be sure. James Kush could of edited those posts immediately. There is no cache to find out if he did or not.

And as Paul Jones said:

"As much as I hate to do this, out of intellectual integrity and being an honest person I have to inform you that I have just carried out a series of tests on post editing on my blog.

I have concluded that the posts do not do any of the following when edited:

1: They do not mark themselves as having being edited
2: They do not change the date or the time after you edit them

Therefore VTV does has a fair point that we still can not 100% verify James Kush did not edit those comments."

Maybe you should do your own research before you start making comments like "It is very clear" that something happened. :)

ok its official VTV has been totally humiliated.

...and somewhere out there is a spyware programmer who's laughing his ass off.