Skeptic Project

@VTV No I won't. I suggest you look at the material I just suggested. It is a very clear that no one edited your blog post, and that people who suggest otherwise are often individuals with the intent on pushing their own agenda which in this case is "Someone edited your blog posts".

If someone edited your blog posts you should of provided proof in the first place. Lets remember the chronology of events here. You stated you had emphatic proof that someone edited your blog posts and you would demonstrate it. The problem is if you are asking me for this information you are already demonstrating you don't even understand what we proposed in the first place and are therefore not in a position to be telling us what is wrong with it. I cannot vouch for what people have told you outside of this forum. I am an "Official" spokesman for the conspiracy science site for a reason.

I have reviewed all of the information and proven to the right people that I am competent. The data your looking for is available in the various FAQs, films, articles and such that have been provided in this thread. One of the reasons this forum is generally only for CS members is none of us have the time to sit here and educate every single person who comes in here with the latest ill-founded argument that we are wrong.

Your statements makes no sense at all. You cannot defend any of your statements. As it is obviously despicable. Well I declare victory on this point then. As it is absolutely irrational that you should think that what I mentioned above is not clear no one edited your blog posts. Simply ignoring this point does not give you anything but obvious failure to make your point.

Its funny that VTV thinks posting here is "work" and "research." He's a very, very "busy" man.

IT'S TIME FOR MORE MOOBS, BUFF CHICKS, AND SEXY SPOCK PEOPLE!

2012 Maybe I should explain something to you.

I didn't post Peter's family's information. I did not have it.

All I set out to "prove" was that Kush could of altered them. I was hoping it would have a notation that they were altered. But as Paul Jones (Anti-cultist) and Cyborg Jesus revealed it leaves no trace when someone decides to alter a post that is posted as a comment on their word press blog.

The fact that I don't have any physical evidence does not automatically make me guilty either. If I was so concerned about you guys finding the truth I would not of helped Kaiser find the original post so he could check the google cache. Sadly the google cache does not go back far enough.

So it comes down to people's opinion of my word against James Kush's. I pointed out that there would be no benefit at all for me doing this. James Kush however stands to gain a lot if people believed him. And they don't.

I don't care about it anymore. I know I didn't do it. And the people who matter to me know that they could trust me on it. What the people at conspiracy science think about it is not relevant to me at all.

So you continue believing I did this and.... what? What consequences does this have? Nobody in the Zeitgeist Movement values what is said here anyway.

You have not revealed anything that absolutely proves that they were not altered. As was stated by two other people here who are not exactly fans of mine.

Here we go again....

VTV is fat and poor.

I decided to go back and look at whatever 2010 is blabbing about. And now I understand the confusion.

Kaiser could not find a google cache that goes back far enough. I pointed out that James Kush altered those posts back in March, when they were made. Unless you can find a google cache that goes back to when I made the posts initially you don't have any evidence that they were not altered.

As Mr. Paul Jones said here:
"As much as I hate to do this, out of intellectual integrity and being an honest person I have to inform you that I have just carried out a series of tests on post editing on my blog.

I have concluded that the posts do not do any of the following when edited:

1: They do not mark themselves as having being edited
2: They do not change the date or the time after you edit them

Therefore VTV does has a fair point that we still can not 100% verify James Kush did not edit those comments."

"And now I understand the confusion."

LOL!

No... no you really don't.

What the people at conspiracy science think about it is not relevant to me at all.

That's why you're making a movie exposing us to be government ran troll bots to sway public opinion. Also, you're fat, vote for Obama!

And yet, VTV is still almost certainly the guy who posted that information.

VTV is and always will be a dishonest white trash loser.

"vote for Obama!"

I agree with this.

"@VTV Your just not admitting when your wrong."

If you are expecting me to admit to doing something I did not do, you are in for a long wait.

He is misquoting again, intellectual dishonesty at its finest from VTV

With tits like these, how could VTV possibly be wrong?

"He is misquoting again, intellectual dishonesty at its finest from VTV"

I quoted what was relevant to the conversation. Your trolling is never relevant. :)