Skeptic Project

TOPIC: What needs to go?

Pets. They are an enormous waste of resources. People spend more of their families resources on keeping pets alive than keeping kids alive. All of those assets could be put to far better use.

Old People. People over 60 are a waste of resources. They consume more medical assets and return nothing to the system. Some say they have experience but really what good is their experience anyhow? Most of them don't like modern technology and refuse to learn how to use it effectively. All of thier experience is useless in a modern tech based world.

I'm not sure of the how exactly. I'd say a massive penalization for being over 60 and a reward of some sort for the family if the old gezers take themselves out voulentarily. As for pets, I'd say just shoot them. Easy enough solution. Get rid of all the laws that say you can't kill another mans dog and I'd be happy to serve as cheif dog killer.

http://www.thezeitgeistmovement.com/joomla/index.php?option=com_kunena&func=view&catid=5&id=335096&Itemid=100114&lang=en#335116

-----

No, he isn't joking.

You wish to exempt the luxury of animals kept for the purpose of vanity yet other expressions of vanity such as fancy cars and big homes must be eliminated? Why the distinction? Is it because you don't want a fancy car or home yet you want to keep that little beast that worships your ability to operate the can opener? That's awfuly selfish. The calories the average family wastes feeding a pet could better be used in the third world to feed a child. The medical resources wasted on a pet could better be used to cure cancer. The waste created by pets, not only their feces but the destroyed furnature and other objects, is a weight on this planet that cannot be tolerated.

Or is it the comments about the elderly that offend your delciate sensibilities? What's the matter, too much truth for you? The elderly are a drain on resources and they offer nothing in return. All their acumulated "wisdom" is useless to us. They would talk about the detalis of money and trade. How much better the world was before technology changed it. How the young are lazy and worthless. Why do we want to bother with them? If we could develop a fair way to penalize them for living and rewarding their families for euthanizing them when they become to great a drain on the planet then what's the matter with that? Fewer useless mouths to feed means more food for the rest of the world.

http://www.thezeitgeistmovement.com/joomla/index.php?option=com_kunena&func=view&catid=5&id=335096&limit=10&limitstart=20&Itemid=100114&lang=en#335879

What about hereditary disease?

(You shoulder this burden: One Erbkranker (person with genetic disease) costs the national community on average 50,000 Reichsmark to reach age 60)

Muertos, I don't think I could agree with you more. This isn't just sick, this goes way beyond. Maybe we should get rid of neo-natal units too. Sick infants are an awful waste of time and money, especially when you can easily have another one. I just got back from the SPIE Defense/Security convention in Orlando, I've been gone all week and was wondering what amusement I'd missed out on. I'm not amused, I'm stunned and sickened. My 76 year old father was recently diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension, it was so bad we didn't think he was coming home from the hospital. He's on oxygen permanently and the longest list of pills I've ever seen. On Saturday my 10 year old came became violently ill and I had to rush her to an emergency vet visit. It was *expensive* but the vet got her stable enough that my son felt he could care for her while I was gone. This is not going over well with me. Not at all.

Somebody PLEASE get a screenshot of this madness. I'm not on the computer where I can store image files and I could see some Zeitmod trying to pretend this kind of stuff doesn't exist.

How many more of him are out there?

"Remind me to quit the movement if your ideas gains traction. I Love my cat and I am almost 60.

I hope you are not that age and if you are oh well you just bit your own dust.

I am out of this movement is this happens. I am pissed about the VP as it is."
Thier is still hope for some of them.

Fancy is a self admitted scientologist, theres no hope for her.

BTW here is what moderator 13 has to say about this topic after 8 pages:

"Please avoid personal attacks and ad hominem"

Nothing else.

God their site is a mess, still downloading. First five pages are safe though.

I have screenies of all his comments as a back up

Yeah the whole denial of emotional value attachment thing is something they have been breeding with the promotion of Fresco all this time, it is no wonder that their movement attracts such cold emotionless jerks.

"That has got to be the single sickest thing I've ever heard out of the Zeitgeist Movement. I didn't think anything these people did could shock me anymore, but this has done it."

This. WTF? WTF?! At least one of my answers about an RBE has been answered, and that was if pets are allowed. Guess not.

Seriously, it seems as it in an RBE, you will have only what you NEED, and you can't have those things that you don't need but can genuinely make life more pleasant.

C'mon, he's an outlier, even for TZM.

Sad thing is that the moderation has 100 rules on "trolling" and "ad hom", but apparently none on spouting disgusting NS-propaganda.

edit: I retract my statement, there's at least three guys like that.

LOL @ the moderators only concern being AD HOMONIDS

This guy is exactly who comes to mind when I think of the typical zeitard. One of the main reasons (besides the fact RBE is a crap idea) that I don't like it.