Hate Mail
Featured
- Nothing to list, yet.
Hate Mail - 911
| Sender: | Greggo Raytashi <raytashi@yahoo.com> |
| Subject: | 911 |
| Type: | Corrections |
| Added: | Apr 27, 2010 |
| Sent to: | Edward L Winston |
Edward,
Your FAQ page contains very few facts for an investigative journalist. I won't
call you names, or tell you everything on the internet is correct. I will
however ask you think about a few unknowns. Journalism has always tried to sway
opinion in the direction of the writer. I get what you are trying to say on your
page. Informed people do not take the media they are fed and believe all of it
either. So, perhaps you could answer a few easy investigative FAQ.
1: One of the most secure buildings in the word, not including all the
infrastructure around it, and not one leaked tape of a plane hitting it. That
place and all the stuff anywhere near it all has cameras. Everywhere. Not a
single clip of the actual attack on the Pentagon.
2: Thermite. What do you have to say about the BYU professor's paper or the
actual photos of molten metal? How can you account for the "plulling" of the
third building within hours when it takes days to set up a demolition?
http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2006/WTC-Jones19mar06.htm
3: Cell phone calls. I know this is touchy, but I've been a pilot for years.
Cell phones don't work at high altitude. Normal cell phones won't work on the
airphone system. There are some systems that are designed to do this now, but in
2001 you would not get a signal above about 6000ft. I've yet to find any
information about airphones installed on that plane, but most carriers took them
out as no passengers wanted to spend $3 a min to call anyone.
4: Crash in PA. I again find this one hard to follow. They took over the plane
and then crashed it? What bunch of heros saves the day, only to kill everyone? I
can deduce no logical reason anyone with control of the aircraft would crash it
roughly 120nm from DC, or 230nm from NY after GAINING control. NOBODY even if
they had NO idea how to fly an aircraft would intentionally crash it after
taking it over from a hostile force.
There are many more "what the fuck" that doesn't make sense problems with the
"official" story. If you are a true journalist then you will be objective in
what I've said. If you are paid by the man to "make" the news then you'll tell
me to fuck off. I'm educated, objective, and mostly want to find truth in
misleading information.
Blue skies,
Greg
Are you kidding me? My FAQ page has little to do with 9/11. Since when am I
an "investigative journalist" or even a journalist? I never claimed to be either
one of those, I'm just some asshole with a blog.
1. Since when are cameras at the pentagon recording at 30fps? 1fps is what most
security cameras do, and that has been released.
2. There are countless reasons why the thermite is bullshit. I seriously suggest
you look into something written by someone else other than known liar Steven
Jones or David Ray Griffin.
3. The cellphone stuff has been debunked by tons of other people. Most of the
calls weren't made from cellphones, but airphones, and despite what you've heard
on truther forums/articles the planes did indeed have them, they were removed
about a year later from many other planes.
4. So, it would have been more heroic to let the suicide pilots crash into
whatever their target was? What makes you think the would-be amateur pilots
crashed the plane? What makes you think it wasn't the suicide pilots that
crashed it?
Why the did you email me? Why not email Mark Roberts?
You're not being objective, at least as far as I can tell. Everything you're
asking about has been discussed for at least 6 years, you just don't want to
look for it or believe it.
More information here:
http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/ But I have feeling you won't be
reading it or taking it seriously, so I don't know why I even waste my time.
Most 9/11 conspiracy theories have been debunked since 2001/2001 and the truth
movement hasn't come up with anything new since 2003, yet you still give them
the benefit of the doubt?
- Edward
[ I don't know why some people bother; when someone says something like "If you are paid by the man to "make" the news then you'll tell me to fuck off." I automatically know they're paranoid. Yeah, I'm sure he's a pilot, do model airplanes count? Too much concrete glue for this guy. ]
Wow, so angry. Perhaps I was wrong to not call you an asshole. You are in fact an asshole. Keep up the good work.
[ This guy emails me with conspiracy theories from 2003, complains about my "investigative journalist" credentials which I never claimed to have, claims that he's a pilot, and claims that cellphones don't work above 6,000 ft. And I'm the asshole? Well, yes, I am an asshole. I frequently mention that on my site, but he wouldn't know that as I'm certain he's never read more than a sentence, most conspiracy theorists never do. Thanks for your insightfulness, captain. ]