Skeptic Project

yup source ?

preferably primary as well in this case, because secondary CT sites hosting a quote are not evidence. you need the original document it came from in full context.

thankyou please.

It's too much work for them to make an account here, since they have to contact a moderator.

Kepp

Here is our evidence that the quote he has is misquoted and taken out context.
the quote is a quote mine and incorrectly quoted from this speech here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MM8NpjmXD00&feature=related

Look at 4 minutes 25 seconds

"This present window of opportunity which during a truly peaceful and interdependant world order might be built will not be open for too long. Already there are powerful forces at work that threaten to destroy all of our hopes and efforts"

Its taken from different parts in the speech and molded together, and taken completely out of context.
I posted this earlier in the thread here but you must have overlooked it.

I guess the burden of proof on him is to now prove thats not the speech hes got misquoted and provide an original source of his quote or we have to assume he has no evidence to counter that he has a misquoted out of context one as a signature.

Because rockefeller says and I quote verbatim:

"This present window of opportunity which during a truly peaceful and interdependant world order might be built will not be open for too long. Already there are powerful forces at work that threaten to destroy all of our hopes and efforts "

And his signature or evidenced quote says:

"This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long - We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."

Isn't it funny how he demands tons of evidence that the quote is incorrect/out of context, yet will accept anything related to conspiracy theories with absolute blind faith and strong obedience to tow the party line?

haha now hes asking for evidence to prove his own quote :s

Thats what he needs to do, prove the second part even exists and belongs alongside his evidence he posted earlier on here:

http://www.sherdog.net/forums/41360131-post87.html

http://www.sherdog.net/forums/41390213-post132.html

"you win"

But he still has the quote in his sig.

Yeah Sil at least he admitted we win. Its right there for everyone to see.

Hes never gonna take that signature off though, even though he said he would, its all part of the CT sickness.

Its not that
Its because he thinks its true even though he can not prove it is.
Even if you proved it untrue he would find another reason to believe it was true.

The most important point is showing how wrong he is publicly and convincingly.
He will never accept counter evidence that kills his belief while hes overly attached to it, thats a given fact, but others who are not as stupid as him will just see how stupid he is.

He is scared to find out he has been duped and prefers living in a self imposed state of denial.

It is more comfortable for him to ignore the glaring fact he is wrong rather than to address and question his entire fabricated belief structure. If he admits one thing is wrong it means he may have to assess and agree that many other things he believes is wrong.

Its like most CT's they have invested far too much of their time, money, emotions into it, as well as they will also have to explain to everyone else they made mistakes. Its more to do with the fact these type of people have real problems being wrong and admitting it publicly. They would much prefer to argue and fight and keep lying to themselves.

Much paranoia over at sherdog

Look at the source. Its MMA forums. They spend their time hating Jews and crushing beer cans on their foreheads while drooling over oily men in tights.

Its a little like AJ crowd on steroids [literally] over there.

Look what I found:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5r7htckec-U&feature=related /> "Gary Hart of the CFR discusses the possibility of a New World Order after 9/11"