Skeptic Project

What's the logic of believing 'Big Pharma' is suppressing cancer cures? I mean, people would still be getting cancer... and Big Pharma would have the cure that they are willing to sell for a big profit I'm sure. Even if they ever made like a cancer vaccine... the same deal applies, they'd make a ton of money from all the people lining up to get the vaccines and no one would have cancer. Sounds like a win/win to me.

There's no such thing as "Big Pharma" it's just a way for homeopaths, eastern medicine types, etc. to demonize a facelacess, imaginary monster. The real world is more complicated than that. Yes, some companies would rather have treatments than cures, but if that were always the case, we wouldn't have most vaccines we have now.

Did you guys bother to read the psychotic video description?

Plus the elite need people to be sick and die to depopulate the world. Curing cancer has no benefit to them whatsoever even though the cure has been made and known for decades. Medicinal herbs and other forms of plants are known to be beneficial in eliminating cancer. Hemp oil can also do the trick as well as drinking organic green tea daily among other things.

Hemp oil, herbs, and drinking organic tea to avoid cancer? That's fucking retarded.

Anyway, back on subject, the drug in question is "dichloroacetic acid" and it is undergoing trials in Canada on whether or not it can be used as a cancer cure. If it can, then it will be. "Big Pharma" isn't some all reaching octopus, if a cancer cure makes it out into the rest of the world, just because the US has a screwed up health industry, doesn't mean Canada, Europe, China, Japan, etc. will ignore it.

If a cancer, HIV, etc. cure is ever found it will come out, no imaginary, evil monster like "Big Pharma" can stop it, the US isn't the center of the universe.

"I don't suppose it ever occurs to these people that "Big Pharma" executives, their wives, kids and friends die from cancer just like everybody else."

So what?

If they invest a billion dollars in a non-exclusive cancer treatment, because their son has cancer, they'll be looking for a new job pretty fast. No investor is going to put any money in that.

The story is probably much less serious than NWO fans make it, DCA has been used off-label for quite a while, and the whole MMS/Natural Care stuff is, off course, BS.

"But what you're saying Jesus Christ is that some guy with shares in a pharmaceutical company sacrifices not only his family's lives, but also his own, in order to keep cancer cures buried? "

The point is that pharma corporations are not some kind of benevolent association of people trying to cure the world of all sickness. They try to deliver maximum profit to their shareholders. If they don't, investors start looking somewhere else.

DCA can't be patented, so there's no point in funding it. They don't "suppress" it, they just don't put any money in. It's not a conspiracy or some evil plan, just regular money math.

Haha this sounds a lot like the vitamin b17 BS.

Actually, green tea has lots of antioxidants, which may help prevent cancer. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_tea</p>

"Over the last few decades green tea has been subjected to many scientific and medical studies to determine the extent of its long-purported health benefits, with some evidence suggesting that regular green tea drinkers have lower chances of heart disease and developing certain types of cancer."

That's funny because the craze right now is that you can't get enough antioxidants.