Skeptic Project

[23:07:39] * inDglass has joined #conspiracies
[23:07:46] <inDglass> hi
[23:07:52] <AaronMHatch> hi
[23:08:27] <inDglass> just came accross the conspiracy science site today
[23:08:41] <inDglass> and saw this chat on the forum
[23:10:36] <Eric> so, are you a conspiracy theorist, just asking questions, or a skeptic?
[23:11:23] <inDglass> i woke up to 9/11 & the nwo back in like '05
[23:11:41] <Eric> and then you realized the conspiracy theories were bullshit?
[23:12:07] <inDglass> the government/msm conspiracy theory?
[23:12:27] <Eric> the "official story" isn't a conspiracy theory
[23:14:14] <Eric> did you find out about us through BTP?
[23:14:18] <inDglass> than what is it?
[23:14:47] <Eric> it's backed up by science; thermite, living hijackers, etc. are all pseudoscience
[23:16:48] <inDglass> too many contradictions in the official story w/ simple physics and chemistry
[23:16:57] <AaronMHatch> oh boy
[23:17:03] <Eric> no, there aren't
[23:17:13] <Eric> please explain to me the simple physics and chemistry
[23:17:52] <inDglass> kerosene doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel
[23:18:06] <Eric> no one claims any steel was melted
[23:18:17] <Eric> except for conspiracy theorists
[23:18:41] <inDglass> the official story claims that fires caused structural damage
[23:18:45] <Eric> steel becomes very weak well within the temperature range of jet fuel, you don't need to melt it for it to collapse
[23:18:50] <inDglass> which collapsed 3 buildings
[23:19:07] <inDglass> the collapse happened too fast anyway
[23:19:15] <Eric> yeah, also planes smashing into two of the buildings, and the third being highly damaged by the falling of the others
[23:19:33] <inDglass> 3rd building was barely damaged
[23:19:40] <Eric> no it didn't, the conspiracy theorists always time it incorrectly, and "free fall speed" means jack shit except in Steven Jones, et al's head
[23:19:45] <Eric> that's not true at all
[23:19:50] <Eric> the third building was highly damaged
[23:19:52] <Eric> and on fire for hours
[23:20:04] <inDglass> the buildings collapsed too quickly. there was too much stationary matter in the way of the collapsing matter to allow such a rapid collapse
[23:20:13] <Eric> http://www.wtc7.net/docs/June2004WTC7_Page_16_cropped.jpg <- it's basically a new apartment!
[23:20:14] <AaronMHatch> what is too quickly?
[23:20:18] <AaronMHatch> what precedent do you have?
[23:20:35] <inDglass> too quickly = free fall speed
[23:20:44] <AaronMHatch> why is that too fast?
[23:21:05] <inDglass> the opposing force of the lower floors of the building would have slowed it down
[23:21:11] <AaronMHatch> why?
[23:21:19] <AaronMHatch> what precedent do you have?
[23:21:23] <inDglass> because it is in the way
[23:21:36] <inDglass> newton's laws, dumbass
[23:21:39] <Eric> do you have any evidence of bombs actually going off during the collapse, blasting caps, resedue, etc?
[23:21:49] <Eric> already at the name calling
[23:21:54] <inDglass> i didn't say that. i didn't even go there yet
[23:22:03] <Eric> that's where you were going
[23:22:08] <Eric> unless you think it was magic
[23:22:19] <inDglass> doesn't matter how it happened
[23:22:26] <inDglass> the point is, the official story is physically impossible
[23:22:27] <Eric> it does, actually
[23:22:39] <Eric> in order for it to be impossible, you need to be able to explain what's more likely
[23:22:52] <inDglass> likelihood has nothing to do w/ it
[23:22:57] <Eric> yes, it does
[23:23:03] <Eric> you're taking the stance of faith alone
[23:23:06] <AaronMHatch> inDglass why did you say kerosine doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel?
[23:23:24] <inDglass> the most fundamental laws of physics say that the building couldn't fall that fast
[23:23:34] <Eric> it didn't fall as fast as you think it did, regardless
[23:23:34] <AaronMHatch> then why did they?
[23:23:44] <inDglass> it fell in less than 15 seconds
[23:23:47] <AaronMHatch> inDglass why did you say kerosine doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel?
[23:24:03] <inDglass> you haven't made any point against the physics claim yet
[23:24:11] <AaronMHatch> that was your first point
[23:24:18] <AaronMHatch> that kerosine doesn't burn hot enough
[23:24:21] <inDglass> you are playing games
[23:24:22] <AaronMHatch> so let's stick to it
[23:24:24] <AaronMHatch> how?
[23:24:30] <inDglass> you are full of shit
[23:24:40] <AaronMHatch> why?
[23:24:48] <inDglass> glad i came in here so i know not to waste any time in this chat or on the con-sci site
[23:24:50] <inDglass> bye
[23:24:52] <AaronMHatch> lol
[23:24:53] * inDglas has left #conspiracies
[23:24:56] <Eric> oh, what a surprise
[23:24:57] <AaronMHatch> priceless
[23:25:19] <Eric> OH NO I CAN'T DEFEND MY POSITION, I'M RIGHT BECAUSE PHYSICS DUMBASS
[23:25:20] <AaronMHatch> I wish I had a direct feed into his room right now
[23:25:36] <AaronMHatch> I want to see him stand up in anger and punch his pillow
[23:26:13] <Eric> http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=inDglass /> [23:26:25] <Eric> http://www.meetup.com/fairtax-5/members/4453841/?op=&memberId=4453841 /> [23:26:27] <AaronMHatch> hahahahah
[23:26:31] <Eric> http://www.bostontea.us/blog/70<br /> [23:26:31] <AaronMHatch> boston tea party

BECAUSE PHYSICS DUMBASS

Want to buy more conspiracy theorists all up in hur.

InDGlass house throwing stones at people.

Wow that chat log reads like someone made it up :D

The whole responses to fire cant melt steel is like someone came along and said whats the most typical truther response.

"too quickly = free fall speed"

Then he says it fell in less than 15 seconds, nope still wrong both were over 15 seconds and the North Tower took over 20 seconds. So does that mean the North tower wasn't a demolition because it was over double free fall?

But truthers dont REALLY care about the time because they "know" that its just too fast, so any time would be "too fast" for them.