Skeptic Project

Your #1 COINTELPRO cognitive infiltration source.

Page By Category

Forum - G. Edward Griffin's crankload

[ Add Tags ]

[ Return to General Discussion | Reply to Topic ]
advancedatheistPosted: Feb 10, 2010 - 21:15
(0)
 

Level: 3
CS Original

As if in confirmation of Mark Hoofnagle's theory of "crank magnetism," look at the broad-spectrum nutter who wrote the anti-Fed propaganda, The Creature from Jekyll Island, G. Edward Griffin:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Creature_from_Jekyll_Island#The_Creature_from_Jekyll_Island</p>

In addition to Fed-hating and other right-wing conspiratorial thinking, he also believes he's found the location of Noah's Ark and supports laetrile as a cancer cure.

As Hoofnagle points out, people who can't recognize their own incompetence have trouble recognizing competence in others, so that you often find people with this deficiency holding several crank ideas at once, and supporting other cranks as well.

#1 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 04:50
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

He's a nutter. It's a shame that he writers one book that has many historical accuracies in it (referring to the Creature, of course).

#2 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
EdPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 08:07
(0)
 

Level: 10
CS Original

Going by your reaction to some posts here Brenton, I think eventually you'll come around to my position eventually. :)

These are the kinds of people that Peter considers good sources. Kind of ironic in this case considering Part 1 of Zeitgeist and that he is an atheist.

#3 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
advancedatheistPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 08:39
(0)
 

Level: 3
CS Original

The whole Jekyll Island meeting thing serves as a distraction from the fact that the alleged "conspirators" all died decades ago. Dead people can't tell living people what to do. If the Federal Reserve System as it operates today causes some problems, we can change its regulations and incentives to alleviate those problems.

#4 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 14:12
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

The interesting thing is that, despite the Constitutional disagreement (which is valid) the Federal Reserve is an illegal entity despite it's deceptive means of coming into existence.
I wouldn't even call them 'conspirators' advancedatheist, because it's so loaded. I'd just say that they were bankers who loved how it worked at home (England and elsewhere) and wanted to replicate that system in the U.S.

Ed, I think that for the most part the Creature is an incredibly good source material. You can ignore one good piece of work from someone because they also think that they have discovered Noah's ark, etc,. I see that sort of behavior as akin to the far-right ignoring everything that could be termed 'leftist' because the left has much of it's ideology born from Marx's ideas.

#5 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
advancedatheistPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 14:20
(0)
 

Level: 3
CS Original

@ Brenton:

The interesting thing is that, despite the Constitutional disagreement (which is valid) the Federal Reserve is an illegal entity despite it's deceptive means of coming into existence.

I go by the law as determined by Congress and the courts. You can believe in your imaginary, metaphysical "law" which the Federal Reserve allegedly violates all you want; but that doesn't change practical reality.

#6 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
EdPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 14:30
(0)
 

Level: 10
CS Original

Brenton writes:
"Ed, I think that for the most part the Creature is an incredibly good source material."

Anyone want to critique Griffin's Creature book?

As far as I know that's where a lot of the banking myths and false quotes were propagated but I haven't read it.

#7 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
EdPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 14:31
(0)
 

Level: 10
CS Original

Brenton do you still think the income tax is illegal?

#8 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Edward L WinstonPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 14:33
(0)
 

President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho: porn star and five-time ultimate smackdown wrestling champion!

Level: 150
CS Original

You know the US Postal Service is also semi-private, is that an illegal entity as well, or only "international banks" illegal?

@Ed,
Wilbur, who I believe is a big zeitgeister, said that all taxes are illegal. I think this is a common misconception amongst the TZM even the ones who don't believe in the first film.

#9 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 15:31
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

By the traditional Supreme Court definition of this section of the Constitution, the Fed would be considered unconstitutional:

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

Congress has to the power to coin money, but it does not have the power to siphon off that responsibility. That is the argument, it is no longer considered valid by the Supreme Court as it was at one stage, apparently.

Ed, I have no opinion on the income tax because it's irrelevant. And yes, there are tons of problems with his book - but historically it contains many accuracies.

#10 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 16:53
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

@Brenton,

The entire point of the Supreme Court is so we aren't locked in a traditional, fundamentalist approach to the Constitution. New Justices bring new perspectives and new biases, which do not have to coincide with those who appointed them as the position lasts for life.

Do you know anything about how this country works? This is grade school civics shit.

#11 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 16:54
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

@Matt:
That's why I said 'this is the argument...apparently'. Did you see me uphold it as the truth? No, you didn't.

#12 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 17:01
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

@Brenton,

Then why the hell are you even trying to argue it if its bullshit?

#13 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 17:11
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

I'm not. I'm just rationalizing that that's their point.

#14 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 17:38
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

@Brenton,

WHY ARE YOU RATIONALIZING BULLSHIT AT ALL?

If something is wrong, you don't rationalize it. You get the right answer.

#15 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Edward L WinstonPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 17:40
(0)
 

President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho: porn star and five-time ultimate smackdown wrestling champion!

Level: 150
CS Original

>> Congress has to the power to coin money, but it does not have the power to siphon off that responsibility.

That's what the US Mint is for

#16 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
advancedatheistPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 17:53
(0)
 

Level: 3
CS Original

@ Brenton:

Congress has to the power to coin money, but it does not have the power to siphon off that responsibility.

But the definition of "money" has changed since then. The Constitution says nothing about representing money as bits in cyberspace, so does that make PayPal unconstitutional because it doesn't use physical coins?

#17 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 22:18
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

@Edward:

The US Mint only coins...coins. Not the paper money.

I'm not really interested in these technicalities (even though I'm discussing them). What's important is the unsustainability of this economic system.

No, advancedatheist it does not.

#18 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 23:33
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

"I'm not really interested in these technicalities (even though I'm discussing them)."

Oh man. That's pretty awesome.

#19 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Edward L WinstonPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 23:41
(0)
 

President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho: porn star and five-time ultimate smackdown wrestling champion!

Level: 150
CS Original

>> Congress has to the power to coin money

True, and that's what the US mint is for.

Congress can't make paper money, but they can't send mail either, so there are semi-private entities to do it for them.

>> No, advancedatheist it does not.

By your absolutist definition of "anything inside of the constitution is legal, anything not mentioned is a crime" it does.

#20 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]