Skeptic Project

All I know is, instead of TVs above the bar showing football or cricket matches, they're showing conspiracy videos on YouTube.

You've posted the same YouTube link three times. Do you really think it's going to stick with repeated postings?

You also exhibit the exact same conceit that most conspiracy theorists do: present something new that repackages the same old arguments from 2003, and if debunkers don't tear down every single one of them AGAIN (as we have been doing since 2003) you declare that it "hasn't been debunked."

And, nice extra adding GMO and fluoride CTs into the mix! Using one conspiracy theory to "prove" another. Par for the course!

Casey, I hope someday scientists study your brain. Maybe we could find a cure for conspiracy theorizing and develop a vaccine.

Casey, if you honestly think that people are shills just because they disagree with you... than I suggest that you consider the alternative: That you're just kind of really dumb. Emphasis on 'really'. And 'dumb'.

You never bothered to read the things that Muertos posted at your request, you just come back with more videos. If you think that 9/11 is an inside job, just because there exists videos out there that haven't been commented on or analyzed by debunkers then to you, 9/11 will always be an inside job because there are is a near infinite amount of 9/11 conspiracy theory videos and a finite amount of debunkers with an even finer amount of time on their hands. You can post all the videos you want, it doesn't matter because they all say relatively the same thing... and those same things have been debunked time and time again.

How come never truthers use a real explosive in their CT. Thermite is not even a explosive. They would look a little smarter if the seid it was TNT or something.

hey casey why doesn't that special camera in the video detect all the explosives going of on every floor.

>> I wonder what this 'pub' serves casey

PCP

Casey, if you believe the evidence presented has no basis in science, what you ought to do is post specific areas of it that you feel are incorrect or questionable, and your explanation for why it is incorrect, along with sourced rebuttals and links to the evidence that demonstrates it.

This is what has been done with nearly every sentence of the Zeitgeist film. It's not just people backing each other up, it's coming together around sourced evidence and finding no reason for it to be wrong. If you have one, you need to actually refute it properly, instead of just yelling and posting YouTube videos, where the "sourced evidence" is simply other conspiracy sites/books.

I don't think Casey read the papers I posted. If his eyes even roamed across the words--which is highly doubtful--he clearly rejected every one of them on the basis that they concluded 9/11 controlled demolition was impossible. Because of that conclusion, the words, whatever they were, must not have been scientific or supportable.

Casey is an interesting example of the most incorrigible form of conspiracy theorist. No amount of logic or evidence would ever get through to him. It's pointless to argue with him because all he'll ever say is that we're "wankers" or "shills" and he'll post more YouTube links.

Muertos were they peer reveiwed papers that you linked?

[quote] Casey, you want something "actually scientific" that proves that the WTC was not a controlled demolition?

Here you go. http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/PDF/NCSTAR%201.pdf

Another one: http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/Bazant_WTC_Collapse_What_Did__Did_No.pdf</p>

And another:
http://www.911-strike.com/BazantZhou.htm</p>

All scientific peer-reviewed materials. Enjoy your reading.[/quote]

DISINFO GOOGLE WAS HACKED YEARS AGO............... SHILL WATCH THIS CLIP BY NWOIZREEL1997 ON YOUTUBE NAD SE THE TRUTH, WANKER!!!!!!!!11111111111
http://www.youtube.com/completegarbage

@ Truth:
I honestly can't express how glad I am to see you write that, I thought you'd forever be lost in the world of conspiraism.

Truth is becoming quite a success story. From CT'er to rational person. You don't see that very often.

Casey, I hope someday scientists study your brain. Maybe we could find a cure for conspiracy theorizing and develop a vaccine.

MAYBE AL GORE WILL!!!

Wveth
Member
PM this user

Casey, if you believe the evidence presented has no basis in science, what you ought to do is post specific areas of it that you feel are incorrect or questionable, and your explanation for why it is incorrect, along with sourced rebuttals and links to the evidence that demonstrates it.

This is what has been done with nearly every sentence of the Zeitgeist film. It's not just people backing each other up, it's coming together around sourced evidence and finding no reason for it to be wrong. If you have one, you need to actually refute it properly, instead of just yelling and posting YouTube videos, where the "sourced evidence" is simply other conspiracy sites/books.

DUDE YOU SEEM TO HAVE MORE ...... ALOT MORE SENCE THAN MOST OF THE TARDS HERE!! I WAS GOING TO REALLY LOOK AT THIS BUT MY ISP WAS CUT AND WHEN I GOT BACK I HAD NOTICED HOW CHILD LIKE SOME OF THESE FOOLS HAD BEHAVED BECAUSE I HANT REPLYED........ BECAUSE I COULDNT.. DERR... FUCKING RETARDS ....... NO ISP NO REPLY STUPID ARSEHOLES!!! I BELIEVE THAT PREPARATION H IS GOOD ON THE HOLE! SHOULD BE USED ON MOST OF THE PEOPLE HERE THEN!! LOL!

O.K. peer casey; Muertos presented some peer reveiwed papers about 9/11. In case you do not peer reveiwed means is that the papers had to have been supported by Sciencetists and Enganeers before published. What is wrong with them.