Skeptic Project

The fact that somthing happend other than what the nist or 911 commision report came up with, dosent make me or anyone else a CTer lol!

http://uncensored.co.nz/2010/05/21/nist-report-on-wtc-7-debunked-exposed/

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1cvkz_911-truth-nist-report-debunked_news</p>

Yep thats the NIST report ripped to shreads lol!

I don't know what 911 debunking vids you are talking about, as you never specified!! I believe the two NIST vids i posted because after waching them they made sence....can anyone here point any faults out therin? Please i want to here your imput!

I may have in the past but i have looked at many more things since then and im more open minded to debate if you are? Check the links, the NIST report and see what you can come up with

http://wtc.nist.gov/

By troll i presume you mean somone using a false account? i.e a troll account?

Muertos if you don't want to engage in debate that is up to you!

Why do you think we should take anything you post seriously?

Easy cop out if you can't think of anything to say then don't!

Because ive been looking at alot of other stuff.... stuff where normally i would think yeah they are right its a CT but i can't make my kind up! Other things fema coffins ...tectonic weapons i just don't belive.... as i said the more im looking the more fantasy stories im seeing! But the NIST report at the very least is not convicing, and its the one thing you tried to shoot me down with!

Im not trying to shoot anyone down... anymore at least! So make up your mind are we going to talk or not, im prepared to and look at any evidece you provide but can you give it in smaller bites please and not all at once so i can digest it! My brain is saying no its a con cover up ect but i want to look at both sides if you don't mind helping i am prepared to listen this time!

p.s in advance
And your not expected to belive me, before you ask me why you should! I would like some critical answers on the two links i posted that is all!

"can you give it in smaller bites please..."

*SIGH* I'm not even sure why I'm bothering, but I'll make one more attempt to get through to Casey.

This is the abstract from one of the papers I posted:

Previous analysis of progressive collapse showed that gravity alone suffices to explain
the overall collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) towers. However, it remains to be checked whether the recent allegations of controlled demolition have any scientific merit. The present analysis proves that they do not. The video record available for the first few seconds of collapse is shown to agree with the motion history calculated from the differential equation of progressive collapse but, despite uncertain values of some parameters, it is totally out of range of the free fall hypothesis, on which these allegations rest. It is shown that the observed size range (0.01 mm—0.1 mm) of the dust particles of pulverized concrete is consistent with the theory of comminution caused by impact, and that less than 10% of the total gravitational energy, converted to kinetic energy, sufficed to produce this dust (whereas more than 150 tons of TNT per tower would have to be installed, into many small holes drilled into concrete, to produce the same pulverization). The air ejected from the building by gravitational collapse must have attained, near the ground, the speed of almost 500 mph (or 223 m/s, or 803 km/h) on the average, and fluctuations must have reached the speed of sound. This explains the loud booms and wide spreading of pulverized concrete and other fragments, and shows that the lower margin of the dust cloud could not have coincided with the crushing front. The
resisting upward forces due to pulverization and to ejection of air, dust and solid fragments, neglected in previous studies, are found to be indeed negligible during the first few seconds of collapse but not insignificant near the end of crush-down. The calculated crush-down duration is found to match a logical interpretation of seismic record, while the free fall duration grossly disagrees with this record.

Source: http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/Bazant_WTC_Collapse_What_Did__Did_No.pdf</p>

There you have it. The towers did NOT collapse at "free-fall speed," contrary to what EVERY 9/11 Truther claims.

I will look into this and reply tomorrow ...AND I PROMISE I REALLY WILL!! Im just dead sleepy and im going to bed! Im watching one more thing and then im calling it for the night.

Interview with John Schroeder 911 FIREMAN

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBb00PQR1zo

Its just ive seen a few of these eyewitness reports, and i cant remeber any of you making a comment on any of them! Muertos Im going to read your post and follow your link and i will ask about it after i have had a good look.

What do you want to bet that tomorrow Casey comes back, ignores everything we've posted and all our questions, and starts spamming YouTube links again and shrieking that it was all a conspiracy?