Skeptic Project

Russia Today, huh? That's like getting your news from CBN. Not only that, but where is the opposing point of view? Oh that's right, it's Russia Today, it's going to be one sided yellow journalism.

"Try to found out what really happened" yet I get this "all white jury in the South" sense during the interview.

I'd also like to mention the amazingly stupid contradiction of truthers talking about the US receiving many warnings Al Qaeda was going to attack the US and ignoring them, while at the same time saying that the terrorists don't exist that Al Qaeda doesn't exist and that the US carried out the attack themselves. What do they think the warnings were for then? Idiots!

EDIT: and we got stupid "put options' claims again, for someone who claims to have worked for Mi5 she sure is ignorant.

EDIT: And Gage starts going on about molten metal again, ignoring the fact that the same evidence for this molten metal also exists for Building 6... but he isn't saying Building 6 was a demolition.

He also claims it was molten iron as if that's been demonstrated... that's right Richard just pull that out of your ass.

Gage is the only one who interests me because he's discussing hard science. I don't understand why there is still a debate on the topics of demolition, free fall, thermite, etc. Why is this not an open and shut case? Why are there still scientists arguing for demolition?

I'm so sick of 9/11 being treated like some sort of mystery that's out there waiting to be solved.

It's not a freaking mystery! We knew what happened on 9/11 and who did it within hours of the event. Calling it a "whodunit" merely reinforces the delusional view of conspiracy theorists that it's some sort of unanswered question and whoever "solves" it is some sort of hero.

Gage is the only one who interests me because he's discussing hard science. I don't understand why there is still a debate on the topics of demolition, free fall, thermite, etc. Why is this not an open and shut case? Why are there still scientists arguing for demolition?

1. Gage is not a scientist, he is an architect. In fact, he will even tell you that himself. But that won't stop him talking about chemistry or physics outside his field as if he were.

2. Some fringe scientists promote crazy things, same thing with historians. There are even scientists that promote Creationism, for example. The point is there are no papers published in any legitimate peer reviewed journals that back up anything truthers claim.

Verinage refutes basically all of Gage's "characteristics of explosive demolition".