Skeptic Project

so what do you guys think of this
http://vimeo.com/16818573

what is nsfw? and what is toolbox?

If she was a fat ugly munter I would hate it, but because shes easy on my eyes I like it.

As far as how useful and interesting it is, welll its pretty fecking boring considering the philosophical implications about wearing clothes or not, there simply arent any.

Either you wanna walk around butt naked or you dont, who really gives a shit ?

TBH those naturists just seem to me like a bunch of anti establishment kooks, wanting to do stupid pointless crap.

I somewhat agree with anticultist and fully with JimJesus. However, naturism/nudism is not about sex and it is not about anti establishment. To me, the message is more about an artificial hypocritical stance of the society, clothes. It is no different than a religion. And it is imposed and outlawed and therefore, it is anti-freedom.

I know it's not about sex. How could you have those kind of thoughts where your standing naked next to a bunch of old fat people who are also naked? I will point out there's places like Hedonism where it is sexual.

A lot of them are Bible thumpers and want to get back to God by shedding their sexual shame. It's just a clusterfuck of stupid shit.

Just keep your clothes on, fatties. Nobody wants to see your junk.

Omni I think that point is addressed in the film

For you JimJesus http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.redwinebuzz.com/winesooth/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/strawman.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.redwinebuzz.com/winesooth/2009/02/&usg=__fiRJ6cDX06As9RfmDx0tLCco4Jc=&h=768&w=576&sz=130&hl=en&start=0&sig2=TD4O5RUakYMIXcwFxZ--Yg&zoom=1&tbnid=CI-zr0Hggwx4zM:&tbnh=161&tbnw=121&ei=Ys73TfbRMMro0QGt85GtCw&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dstraw%2Bman%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26sa%3DN%26biw%3D1280%26bih%3D699%26tbm%3Disch&um=1&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=475&vpy=102&dur=25&hovh=259&hovw=194&tx=95&ty=172&page=1&ndsp=21&ved=1t:429,r:2,s:0&biw=1280&bih=699

oh it was a pic of a straw man. Nobody is debating practicality of clothes. When you want to smelt some gold or fry some bacon, you'd be an idiot to not wear clothes. The question in the current society, can you not wear clothes when you don't want to? No. And that is anti-freedom.

Devkant stop being annoying.

Bobbie, ignore this thread. You don't have any significant jackstinky to add anyway. Cyborg, thats a pretty cool flowchart

Did anyone who actually watched it listen to the rambling shite the old wrinkly gardner was saying ?

The ramblings of an acid casualty if ever I heard one.

freeflyer says its not anti establishment to be a nudist, yet listen for longer than 5 minutes to one and you will quickly gather that they summise the establishments forcing them to wear clothes around others to be a violation of their civil rights and freedoms [or stupid and childish, being used in this instance] etc blah blah blah.

Fact remains is it has fuck all to do with the government forcing them, if some old wrinkly fart wandered into your workplace butt naked, you would probably find a dozen or more people avert their eyes from the train wreck. Not because theyre programmed sheeple, but because they dont fucking like what theyre looking at.

Simply put, people should be forced to wear clothes because theyre god awful to look at, if you dont like that opinion I dont care because its true. People are going to be visually offended by looking at peoples bits dangling in their face in close proximities, its just a fact of everyday life.

As an example::Last thing I fucking want is a whole horde of penises dangling in proximity to my face as they walk down the aisle when I am trying to sit on the train. Stick some fucking shorts on god damn it !!!

Even some idiot wants to show everyone his junk in Ancapistan or Libertaria, people will get pissed and not let him patronize any store, they won't let him walk on their streets/sidewalks, goto their parks...etc.

So no, it's not tyranny it's decency. Put some pants on, you're scaring the kids, and get the the hell out of my store you freak.