[ Add Tags ]
[ Return to General Discussion | Reply to Topic ] |
Geo | Posted: May 22, 2010 - 15:11 |
| ||||
![]() Level: 1 CS Original | On 6 million: A supposedly Jewish CT, Jeff, is saying not 6 million and is pointing to random census information about Poland. Can you point me to some primary sources showing that, before WWII, there were around 3.3 million Jews in Poland (or more than 1 million or so) that you'd think he might accept (well, they never accept) or give him pause? He also claims Germans were receiving 800 calories/day while camp prisoners received 1700 calories. I'm not sure where he gets this. Perhaps he thinks the nice Nazi guards went hunting, gathering and farming outside Auschwitz walls to feed the prisoners, whereas food was scarce in the other war-plagued cities. On gas chambers: What do you guys make of David Cole's questions? http://www.codoh.com/gcgv/gc46-origi.html</p> On one point made there -- the lack of significant Zyklon B traces -- A debunking site said traces were found on the ventilators, if not the chambers themselves. Anyone know where the independent investigation of that might be found? How about crematoriums IV and V? Any independent forensic studies of that? | |||||
#1 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
Edward L Winston | Posted: May 22, 2010 - 15:24 |
| ||||
![]() President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho: porn star and five-time ultimate smackdown wrestling champion! Level: 150 CS Original | The best one I know is: | |||||
#2 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
Sil the Shill | Posted: May 22, 2010 - 15:47 |
| ||||
![]() Level: 9 CS Original | "He also claims Germans were receiving 800 calories/day while camp prisoners received 1700 calories." Why on earth would they keep their prisoners more nourished than their guards? | |||||
#3 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
Muertos | Posted: May 22, 2010 - 15:48 |
| ||||
![]() Paid Disinformation Blogger Level: 14 CS Original | Geo, a word of warning to you if you're debating Holocaust deniers. Although most conspiracy theorists try to redefine the territory before they begin the "debate," Holocaust deniers are usually aces at doing this. Do NOT let them pull you off the track into details and minutiae, but with the kind of questions you're asking here I fear that may already have happened.
I know nothing about David Cole other than what ADL has on their page about him (link here: http://www.adl.org/poisoning_web/cole.asp). But the questions strike me as classic Holocaust denier issues. Stuff like "where were Zyklon B traces located" and "where were the Zyklon induction holes in the roof of the chambers" are bullshit questions that are designed as red herrings. My advice to you is to not debate them, because if you start arguing about where traces of Zyklon B were found, you have conceded the point they already want you to accept--which is that it is not the eyewitness testimony of millions of people and literally tons of documents that constitute the bulk of the evidence regarding what happened in the Holocaust, but that the evidence is flimsy enough to be impeached by "just asking questions" about technical crap like holes in the roof and where traces of Zyklon B were found. Furthermore, these questions indicate that whoever wrote them (Cole, I assume) has little understanding of the history of the Holocaust. For example some of the "issues" he raises (#s 23-26) involve physical evidence at Dachau. However, Dachau was not and never was an extermination camp--it was a concentration camp (there's a difference). You can find that on Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dachau_concentration_camp) where it says, "Although there is no evidence of mass murder within the camp itself by other methods than poor sanitation, deprivation of medical care, withholding of nutrients, medical experiments, and beatings and shootings for infractions of the rules or at random..." Therefore it's clear this guy Cole is not starting from the standpoint of documented history and trying to ask fair questions about it if he isn't even right about what he thinks he's questioning. My advice is, don't debate the number of calories guards were getting. If this guy Jeff thinks the Holocaust didn't happen or wasn't that bad, ask him to debunk the transcript of the Wannsee conference (it's here: http://prorev.com/wannsee.htm but don't read it before bed, you won't sleep for a month). That is, if he even knows what the Wannsee conference is. | |||||
#4 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
Geo | Posted: May 22, 2010 - 15:54 |
| ||||
![]() Level: 1 CS Original | Thanks Captain Ferseus, unfortunately that 66 Q&A does not seem to address some of this and doesn't link to primary source of census. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_census_of_1931</p> The wiki shows over 2.8 million Jews in Poland in 1931 census, but I can not find that number in the cited material (I only looked over the short Polish document in the references and didn't see any numbers written in Arabic numerical form. Are you able to find the original docs? | |||||
#5 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
Muertos | Posted: May 22, 2010 - 16:04 |
| ||||
![]() Paid Disinformation Blogger Level: 14 CS Original | On the web? Doubt you'd find it. I'd hit a good university library on that one and see what they have. | |||||
#6 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
Geo | Posted: May 22, 2010 - 16:43 |
| ||||
![]() Level: 1 CS Original | Muertos, Thanks, again. I am trying to be cautious while investigating their 'questions'. These Denier CTs can be very tricky in ignoring the existing facts. Most of my grandparents' families died in the Holocaust, as did those of many of my friends. It can be sensitive topic around here, so I'm trying to be objective with people that question it. I'm not sure how many of the camp survivors say what about what they saw of the gas chambers, but the deniers try to paint the picture that in some cases trauma and memory was egged on by propaganda of the winning side and that some material was planted, etc. You know, the usual CT crap. That is why I wanted to focus on primary forensic and pre war census data. As for the 'missing' Zykon:, under other circumstances, I think that might raise some eyebrows. Of course there are other explanations and these questions need to be weighed against other evidence like the testimonies, etc. As for Cole on Dachau, I did the same think you did -- look to see if the places he mentioned are even said to be death camps. The argument was not about calories of guards, but of prisoners vs german population. I think we can ignore that for now because Jeff hasn't cited any sources for that yet. I just told him that if this were true, for any significant length of time, it would have been the German people as a whole that looked like skin on bones and not the people in the camps. He started saying that 800 calories was not that bad for 1000 days (no fundamental different than for 100 days), and I did the weight-loss to calories calculation for him 100 and 1000 days to show him the great difference there. As for the Wannsee Conference, I will try to show that to Jeff, but you know these CTs and deniers, they'd try to dismiss something like that as a post-war winning-side fabrication of some sort. | |||||
#7 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
Sil the Shill | Posted: May 22, 2010 - 16:56 |
| ||||
![]() Level: 9 CS Original | Sorry, I just assumed you meant guards. :X | |||||
#8 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
Von Kleist | Posted: May 22, 2010 - 17:24 |
| ||||
![]() Level: 1 CS Original | You could maybe ask if he knows of anyone, on trial for crimes committed relating to the Holocaust, used the defence 'it never happened'. There are tens of thousands of cases, some acquitted, some imprisoned, some executed. You'd think some of them would have 'blown the whistle' on the 'hoax'. But apparently not. Amusingly, most deniers are more than willing to refer to Jewish survivors as liars but are strangely reticent to apply the same label to the SS/Partei. | |||||
#9 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
Muertos | Posted: May 22, 2010 - 17:32 |
| ||||
![]() Paid Disinformation Blogger Level: 14 CS Original | Good luck Geo. Just speaking for myself, if numerous members of my family perished in the Holocaust the last thing I would try to be with Holocaust deniers would be "objective"! What irks me about CTs in general, and Holocaust deniers in particular, is how they assume that historical truth hangs on such slender hooks. 9/11 Truthers approach what happened on 9/11 as some sort of "mystery" that must be "solved." In reality there's no mystery at all, and what happened begins largely with the experiences of the people who went through it, whether as victims, perpetrators, survivors, responders and observers. Truthers act like this colossal body of understanding doesn't exist, and assume that non-CTs believe what they believe about 9/11 because an "official story" was told to them by the gubbermint or media or whatever. For all of the technical aspects of it, at its heart the Holocaust was an intensely personal and human experience. Holocaust deniers act like whatever happened was sort of a big incomprehensible blur that was impossible to understand at the time and that history as commonly accepted put some kind of official stamp on it later on, and they're challenging that official stamp. They pretend that bullshit like "missing" Zyklon can somehow be conclusive in changing the basic totality of the event. That totally ignores the real life experiences of the millions of people who went through this thing. | |||||
#10 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
Edward L Winston | Posted: May 22, 2010 - 19:10 |
| ||||
![]() President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho: porn star and five-time ultimate smackdown wrestling champion! Level: 150 CS Original | Well, what I've found most interesting about holocaust deniers is how they explain away the fact that captured Nazis as well as constructors and executors of the holocaust, never denied the holocaust happened, never denied numbers or anything else. Typically if you point this out it comes down to their claim that the individuals were "tortured by Zionists" or something similar. Surely if the holocaust didn't happen or only 1 million people were killed, this fact would have been raised by at least one person on trial, but that's never happened. | |||||
#11 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
Geo | Posted: May 23, 2010 - 05:04 |
| ||||
![]() Level: 1 CS Original | And they might even also say that some people didn't say certain things at the trials. I watched some of the Eichmann documentary to show them otherwise. Would have been nice to have the whole thing on video, with English subtitles. Great, now he is posting BS about swimming pools instead of responding with the census data he supposedly had that refuted the 6 million. Gonna have to tell him he's dumb again and hope he is smart enough to understand this time :) | |||||
#12 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
Edward L Winston | Posted: May 23, 2010 - 14:11 |
| ||||
![]() President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho: porn star and five-time ultimate smackdown wrestling champion! Level: 150 CS Original | I know the swimming pools thing was covered on nizkor. I'm not sure why it's so crazy that camp officers would have a swimming pool, but the prisoners wouldn't. I guess even at modern prisons, the offices for guards can be used by prisoners too? | |||||
#13 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
Sil the Shill | Posted: May 23, 2010 - 15:01 |
| ||||
![]() Level: 9 CS Original | What is the significance of the swimming pool claim? I guess it seems a odd just because a swimming pool has very recreational connotations, whereas concentration/death camp does not. Edit: From Nikzor: (Claim)* There was a swimming pool in Auschwitz, hence it could not have been an extermination camp. -Indeed, a water reservoir in Auschwitz I (the main camp) was converted to a swimming pool which was used by the camp's staff. Other means of entertainment for the SS personnel existed - a band composed of prisoners, and a brothel (which some prisoners were permitted to use). How this "proves" that Auschwitz was not an extermination center is beyond the author of this text. | |||||
#14 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
Sil the Shill | Posted: May 23, 2010 - 15:43 |
| ||||
![]() Level: 9 CS Original | @Geo: In the link that you posted, it even states at the end: "When Höss was promoted to Berlin, his replacement, Kommandant Arthur Liebehenschel, was put in charge of just the Auschwitz camp... [...] He had the water trough near Blocks 7 and 8 converted into a swimming pool for Kapos and prisoners who worked well." Seems to be some varying accounts on how many pools and whether the officers and prisoners shared one or had separate ones, but the important thing to note is that this doesn't disprove that Auschwitz was NOT an extermination camps. Brief internet search says that there were 3 types of camps. "Aktion Reinhardt" camps, which were pure extermination camps (Treblinka, Sobibor, Belzec). Prisoners were moved in and exterminated. I agree that a swimming pool at one of these camps would be completely out of place, however Auschwitz was a concentration and extermination camp. So people were selected out of the populace and exterminated, but many were kept alive to work and I guess the best-workers were rewarded with some swimming pool use. The last type of camp were just labor camps/prisons with no "extermination policy", until late in the war. | |||||
#15 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
Geo | Posted: May 23, 2010 - 17:37 |
| ||||
![]() Level: 1 CS Original | I didn't find that in Nizkor. Spider didn't reach it? Removed to fit a better Q in spot # 60? | |||||
#16 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
Sil the Shill | Posted: May 23, 2010 - 18:18 |
| ||||
![]() Level: 9 CS Original | My first post was what I got from Nikzor, second post was from a different source. | |||||
#17 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
Von Kleist | Posted: May 23, 2010 - 18:25 |
| ||||
![]() Level: 1 CS Original | It's worth noting that Auschwitz-Birkenau was a labour camp/concentration camp which later had an extermination facility added. | |||||
#18 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
Geo | Posted: May 23, 2010 - 18:52 |
| ||||
![]() Level: 1 CS Original | Would it be good to have the videos from the Nuremberg trials on university archive websites or the net somewhere? I want to see them but don't know where to find them (in university archives(?)) and am probably not going to look around the library, physically. | |||||
#19 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
Dr_Benedict_Zaroff | Posted: May 29, 2010 - 23:25 |
| ||||
![]() Level: 1 CS Original | "On one point made there -- the lack of significant Zyklon B traces -- A debunking site said traces were found on the ventilators, if not the chambers themselves. Anyone know where the independent investigation of that might be found? How about crematoriums IV and V? Any independent forensic studies of that?" No doubt taken from the long ago debunked "Leuchter Report." | |||||
#20 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |