Skeptic Project

For a while I was one of those who thought the water was dangerous. I believed that the hot shower water was soaking chlorine into my body. Actually, that may be the case. Regardless, I can't find a peer-reviewed study showing that the amount of chlorine in said water is actually harmful.

I have read an article about birth control medicines, aspirin, and other prescription drugs getting into the water supply due to poor compost methods. While this may be the case, I suppose I've grown tired of concerning myself too much. A little viagra and birth control can't hurt my social agenda, anyhow. ;)

In the end, I suppose there's part of me that worries about the government putting a muzzle on any studies showing that my water is dangerous. It's always possible, I guess. When I consider the possibility of entire districts getting "poisoned" for elitist purposes, I struggle to remain suspicious. It's certainly possible; but is it plausible or feasible? I'm not so sure.

Casey, when will you get it through your head that YOUTUBE DOES NOT COUNT AS A RELIABLE SOURCE?

Footage of that day, have seen the same and other footage showing the same.... and not just on youtube ive seen it on "imnotbias.com" lol no only joking but i have seen and read alot of the same!! You know im not joking here i came into all off this with an open mind and i have to say that you lot havent helped at all!! I dont mean to be rude but you couldnt convince a hetrosexual man he liked females!!

"Casey, when will you get it through your head that YOUTUBE DOES NOT COUNT AS A RELIABLE SOURCE?".. I agree when it is taken out of context, otherwise I do not agree.

No_Heros, you need to read this:
http://conspiracyscience.com/blog/2010/05/28/why-conspiracy-theorists-love-youtube/

Muertos aww that old crap again... budding writer or somthing lol

There isn't anything wrong with Youtube videos themselves, if I want to demonstrate how long it took the WTC to collapse, or what George Bush said in a interview, the best way to do it is with a video of the event. The problem is with home-edited "Youtube Documentaries" or whatever you want to call them, because they usually don't give any kind of source or way of checking the information.

Muertos god nice fast reply lol!!

And I'm more than a budding writer, I've published several books.

post links please

"sil how was that link taken out of context?? iT WAS FOOTAGE OF FIREFIGHTERS ON 911!!!! FFS.... god you lunatics!!!! "

From an earlier post

"A chaotic, dangerous situation and someone connects explosions with bombs? Surely you jest! "

Also, I think some of the home made Youtube videos are okay, there are some good ones debunking 9/11. Ed from this forum made a few that were pretty good. People just need to use other sources as well. the worst videos on Youtube are the videos where some random guy is just talking in front of the camera offering there own commentary. If someone can't be bothered to read an article, they're wasting their time anyway.

Where are the Kindle versions, jackass?! lol

Coming soon.

no ed im not saying the newyork firefighters were lying..... they were telling the truth!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJhPht_Cjgs

So then you must agree there was severe damage of Building 7, everyone expected it to come down, and that there were huge uncontrollable fires that weren't fought.

Here's one commenting on WTC7:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnYBX6QT0R4

Glad you agree WTC7 wasn't a demolition then!... oh wait?

Regarding your link, do you know the context of this comment? I do. It is in reference to Stuyvesant High School in which there was a bomb threat.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozMYlC-Tlb8

Clearly the firefighter was trying to get everyone out of the area. It turned out there was no bomb in Stuyvesant High School.

Do you have anything other than out of context quotes, Casey?