Skeptic Project

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eKYyD14d_0

This is why I stopped eating meat.

Oh, I forgot, that's the *only* way to process meat.

To be fair, Edward, if the majority of meat operations in the USA (I believe Danny's in the USA) function like Monsanto, then the options for meat are few.

Of course, I haven't watched Food Inc., nor do I know how the meat industry works. I'm not really sure of how I could find that out through an unbiased medium, either.

Does the fan base change the content of the movie though?

Yeah, I see what you're getting at.

Matt,why are you a liberal?

Liberal- Meaning more progressive and little bit more open to those with secular ideas may have little or no backing with a reilgous influence. More for government spending with some and others not (Hence Libertarianism). Involved with many civil and social rights of others such as gays,illegal immigrants,affirmative action.

Conservative- Traditonalist. some seem to be into less government involvment(I.e. welfare,), and use alot of their backing with their faith. A little bit more noticeable with their craziness, but are judge more harshly then those on the left end of the political spectrum.

I consider myself a Young Traditonalist Constiution Enthusiast.

@Matt

You're joke about Liberitarians was pretty humorus. I've got a better one.

"Liberitarians are just cheap liberals."

Edit:

Edward, why are you an Atheist?

"when it comes to conservatism in America, "less government involvement" is definitely a popular motto, and it's a true belief for many "conservatives" unless it involves homosexuality, then it's "as much government intervention as possible." "

Well shouldn't we? I mean how does america benefit from two joes marrying each other?

Our population. Granted not everyone is gay, but if they were our popultation would indeed shrink by alot, but of course that would take decades.

That's another problem this country has: Dumb women and men who can't keep it in there pants.

Yes and no. I say no because we need RESPONSIBLE people to raise proper, and respectful children.

I say yes because it stregnths the morale of our country.

But they won't listen, that's why they'll keep having sexand reporducing so he have a bunch of idiot welfare cases running around.

Welfare is far more rare than you think, Danny.

I'd like to see any source you have that we spend nearly as much as other countries (like 35% in Sweden) on welfare. I don't have a source on hand, but in the late 1990s about 1% of all taxes were spent on welfare programs. I also don't think you know exactly what welfare is.

>> But no, we are seeing low IQ people infect our gene pool with their stupidity and reproducing bringing more idiots into this world then there needs to be

You're kind of all over the place. People who talk about things like this tend to promote population control.

Going to steal your little double arrow here, sorry Edward. :P

>>"Liberal- Meaning more progressive and little bit more open to those with secular ideas may have little or no backing with a reilgous influence. More for government spending with some and others not (Hence Libertarianism). Involved with many civil and social rights of others such as gays,illegal immigrants,affirmative action."

Oh, the horror!

>>"Conservative- Traditonalist. some seem to be into less government involvment(I.e. welfare,), and use alot of their backing with their faith. A little bit more noticeable with their craziness, but are judge more harshly then those on the left end of the political spectrum."

A lot of conspiracy theorists try to identify themselves with the founding fathers, not saying you're one of them... but it's always a contradiction considering they were such strong proponents of separation of church and state.

>>"Our population. Granted not everyone is gay, but if they were our popultation would indeed shrink by alot, but of course that would take decades. "

"That's another problem this country has: Dumb women and men who can't keep it in there pants. "

"Yes and no. I say no because we need RESPONSIBLE people to raise proper, and respectful children.

I say yes because it stregnths the morale of our country. "

Wait, so what's the problem. People who can't reproduce or people who can reproduce? Responsibility isn't just involved in raising children, but in how many children people have. I can't say I see too much responsibility in a family that chooses to have 9 kids just because they believe they have to spread their seed as much as they can.

>>"But no, we are seeing low IQ people infect our gene pool with their stupidity and reproducing bringing more idiots into this world then there needs to be. We need to really install the belief of natural selection into the future generations."

So what are you advocating? It sounds a lot like population control. So in your future dream vision of America, where all the "tyrants" are dead and prosperity and freedom rains down on all... there will be people telling other people that they can not reproduce, there will be groups advocating natural selection and only allowing the fittest specimens to breed? Sounds pretty tyrannical to me.

And how would you qualify people who were "unfit" to breed? Would it be immigrants? Liberals? Or maybe people who lacked critical thinking skills, as well as the inability to use a spellchecker?

Sorry if I'm coming off harsh, but you are sounding like a MAJOR hypocrite and a little bigoted.