Page By Category
Forum - Do the 9/11 Truthers claim that there were explosions before the planes hit the
[ Add Tags ]
| [ Return to General Discussion | Reply to Topic ] |
| mikejohnson | Posted: Mar 29, 2011 - 06:15 |
| ||||
 Level: 1 CS Original | Do the 9/11 Truthers claim that there were explosions before the planes hit the wtc on 9-11-01 What the links between the explosions in the wtc and the 9/11 Conspiracy Theories ? | |||||
| #1 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] | |||||
| mikejohnson | Posted: Mar 29, 2011 - 09:05 |
| ||||
Level: 1 CS Original | Have you ever heard this ? | |||||
| #2 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] | |||||
| Agent Matt | Posted: Mar 29, 2011 - 09:49 |
| ||||
 Genuine American Monster Level: 70 CS Original | There weren't any, if any eye witnesses claimed there were they were simply mistaken. That's all there is to it. | |||||
| #3 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] | |||||
| Muertos | Posted: Mar 29, 2011 - 10:06 |
| ||||
 Paid Disinformation Blogger Level: 14 CS Original | Twoofers don't care when anyone heard explosions. Before the plane strikes, after the strikes, doesn't matter. To them, if one person claims to have heard an explosion, anywhere, at any time, under any circumstances, they were hearing the demolition charges go off. Period. Even if it happened 20 minutes before one of the towers collapsed. Because, you know, super-nano-thermate takes a long time to take effect. It doesn't matter whether it makes sense. Nothing Twoofers believe makes sense, so why should you expect this to? | |||||
| #4 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] | |||||
| Ed | Posted: Mar 30, 2011 - 09:52 |
| ||||
Level: 10 CS Original | There is Willy Rodriguez who is AFAIK the only person who says there was an explosion in the basement before the plane hit. For him, see this: As for pretty much everyone else they use see my video: Explosions WERE heard. LOTS of explosions were heard. The thing is that explosion doesn't necessary mean bomb. A blackdraft in a fire IS an explosion. A fuel air explosion IS an explosion. Steel breaking can sound like an explosion, etc. So not only are there plenty of things on 911 that can literally be defined as being an explosion and not be from a bomb, but there's plenty of things that can sound to people like a bomb or explosion but wasn't. We should EXPECT there to have been reports of explosions on 911. The big issues truthers don't want to deal with is... 1. Why NO ONE suffered any blast injuries (injuries consistent with explosives) despite all these bombs going off and blast injuries being common in every other bombing. They even know the names and identities of the people they claim was caught in bombs and were even injured by bombs, yet none of them care enough to find out if they had ANY injuries consistent with explosives! 2. When all this steel flinging and sky scraper pulverising that's meant to be occuring when the towers collapse no explosions can be caught on any of the numerous cameras surrounding the building. This is also true for WTC7. There's at least 5 or 6 video's of the collapse that would have picked up explosions from any detonation charges yet nothing happens. Truthers believe in loud explosions when they want but quiet ones when it suits them. They also seem to think that nano thermite is an explosive, it isn't, but even if it was it can't make it a quiet intense one. Thats a contradiction that for some reason no truthers I've ever come across seems to understand. | |||||
| #5 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] | |||||