Skeptic Project

You didn't mention just Silverstein you specifically said he was a jew, why would you need to do that? What RELEVANCE does that have? Give a good reason why you would talk this way.

I think I've already answered this, but the answer is simple, so here it is again. I mentioned Larry Silverstein is an australian jew because he's a jew from Australia. I also mentioned that the men identified by the FBI as "suicide hijackers" are muslim arabs. I suppose this doesn't help my case much, since arabs are all semites as well. What if I call Bozo a clown, does that make me anti-clown? What if I say grass is green? Does that make me anti-green or anti-grass or both?

@Plautus Satire

What about the "Jew York" statement?

Therefore I wondered why you suddenly started talking about smoking, it looks like you were correlating your lack of asthma with your smoking.

So what are you saying about smoking and asthma? Do you believe smoking helps asthma?

I didn't say that, but I'll say now, in my case, smoking tobacco cured my asthma.

What about the "Jew York" statement?

What about it?

If you're interested, Plautus, I can introduce you to several personal friends of mine whose close family members perished at Auschwitz and other camps. I'm sure they would be happy to explain to you what happened to them and their families from personal factual experience.

Many people believe their family members were all killed in nazi gas chambers and their bodies were burned utterly, leaving no trace behind.

This turns out to be erroneous, in some cases:

In 1991, Hollander received an invitation to debate a Holocaust denier on "The Montel Williams Show." Some, including Zack, advised him not to accept, arguing that to even appear on the same stage with a denier was to give his views legitimacy. But Gambert felt otherwise, and Hollander agreed to go on the show.

By chance, a man in Brooklyn recognized him as the spitting image of his friend in Serbia, who turned out to be a brother Hollander thought was dead.

"I'm in seventh heaven, what can I tell you?" Hollander told the Bulletin in 1992, after he learned of the news. "I cry every day from joy."

Zoltan Hollander had indeed been strung up to die in 1944, but he fell between the trees and played dead until he could escape. After 10 years of forced exile in Siberia, he eventually made his way to Kragujevic, Yugoslavia, where he became a printer. He believed his entire family had perished in the war, having no idea he had two brothers in California and extended relatives throughout the United States, Canada and England.

http://www.jweekly.com/article/full/18192/holocaust-survivor-lecturer-ernie-hollander-dies-at-77/

And you pretended to be a medical doctor as well, oh man, hilarious!

I don't pretend anything, smoking tobacco ceased all my asthma attacks forthwith.

I mentioned Larry Silverstein is an australian jew because he's a jew from Australia. I also mentioned that the men identified by the FBI as "suicide hijackers" are muslim arabs. I suppose this doesn't help my case much, since arabs are all semites as well. What if I call Bozo a clown, does that make me anti-clown? What if I say grass is green? Does that make me anti-green or anti-grass or bot

Its relevant to say the hijackers were arabs and muslims.

Its relevant to say Bozo is a clown.

It is not relevant to say Silverstien is a jew in the context you used it.

THAT ALONE wouldnt be enough to make you an anti-semite, it just raises eye brows.

But you are also a holocaust denialist and also say other stupid things like "jew york" which cant be rationalised any way you look at it and also make 911 jewish-implicating conspiracy theories.

Put it all together and you are what is most obvious.

Here is a guy I'm sure you will love:
http://www.erichufschmid.net/

Its relevant to say the hijackers were arabs and muslims.

Its relevant to say Bozo is a clown.

It is not relevant to say Silverstien is a jew in the context you used it.

How interesting, it's not relevant to say a jew is a jew, but in every other case any information is relevant... eh-hem

But you are also a holocaust denialist

What exactly is it you think I've "denied"? I simply reported that the Auschwitz museum has revised the number of jews killed there from "four million" to "perhaps one million", and such is the case. If you think the curators of the Auschwitz museum are "denialists", take it up with them.

Prove it happened, prove this system exists outside the ramblings of one nutcase on the internet.

You tried before, you can't, because it doesn't exist.

If it did it wouldn't be so very difficult for you to show some evidence. You even said it was well known and it wasn't a secret, so come on find some evidence or admit you are wrong.

I apologize for being alive during the seventies and for having a memory longer than that of a goldfish.

Thats right it isn't necessary to say Silverstein is jew unless you are making a point about his jewishness. Now we know why you said that.

What "point" did I make about Larry Silverstein's "jewishness"?

You can also shit your pants. You have the freedom to do that too. But, in civilized society we don't shit our pants and we don't mention that people are Jews.

This is a very interesting view that I haven't heard before. It's not "civilized" to call a jew a jew. And what if I am a jew? My mother's mother was jewish, a german jew, so that means my mother was a jew and so am I.

You already accused him or murdering thousands of people for the insurance money then said he was a good Jew, so why don't you tell me?

I think you're imagining things. I didn't say Larry Silverstein was a "good jew" and I didn't say he murdered anyone.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>I don't pretend anything, smoking tobacco ceased all my asthma attacks forthwith

hhahhaahaha, stop it seriously.

Seems a little ridiculous to implement a system that would only cover domestic and US based airlines against hijackings. They do allow foriegn airlines to operate in US air space no?

Look at where all those Boeing planes were designed and built. Also consider the fact that remote control technology is orders of magnitude easier to develop than aeronautical technology, so any facility that can produce passenger jets could produce an identical system. It would be obscenely negligent not to implement such a system.