Skeptic Project

>>>Like I said, they believed the official fables about phone calls. If you think something is impossible, then somebody tells you it happened, if you believe them, you struggle to explain how the impossible could have happened.<<<

This is from the article you posted.

The article you're deceptively attempting to use to prove your point.

So if you don't believe what these people are saying then why did you post the article?

>>his is simply not true. Dozens of people that I know personally also know it. That ou do not know it is testament to your colossal ignorance./

LOL!

..."Dozens of people that I know personally"

Why cant you find any other source apart from some random people you know? Is that evidence to you? I'm just meant to believe you? You aren't anywhere near that credible.

Is there a conspiracy to strip all mentions of it from the internet when people like you try and find a source on it?

The fact that this guy has "satire" in his name just sticks out at me.

But surely no one could take a troll identity to such a level and for so long.

>>>This is simply not true. If you look at the timeline, most of these hypothetical calls took place when the planes were at altitudes exceeding 8000 feet, when communication with towers would have been absolutely impossible. Again we have a case here of somebody struggling to understand how the impossible could have happened, because they believed a lie. Where are the logs of these calls? Where are recordings of these calls?<<<

If you look at the evidence you'll see that most of the calls made were from Air phones not cell phones.

As far as the recordings of these calls, that would most likely be up to the family and cell providers to release.

Have you contacted them or do you just do google based research and rely on the previous lies of other to prop up your own?

Your own article is making your claim look foolish.

>>>>I'm not aware of one. Is there one?

Apparently so, you can't find any evidence for it so I guess the government removed it all! OMG!

Apparently so, you can't find any evidence for it so I guess the government removed it all! OMG!

hmm...if you say so...why couldn't it just be simple ignorance, though?

>>>>hmm...if you say so...why couldn't it just be simple ignorance, though?

Because you said it was well known.

How come you can't find anyone else that knows about it and all official procedures act as if it doesn't exist and no ones ever brought this up in the media?

You're going to have to admit you're wrong somewhere, just decide in what way.

Stupid question. How about... do you dislike anyone because of their race?

I don't believe in race, to be honest. All human beings are one race. What do you define as a "black" person? Clearly you have some ideas about race, please share them.

>>What do you define as a "black" person? Clearly you have some ideas about race, please share them.

People who dislike black people typically mean any non-Caucasian, it usually refers to Africans however.

Well that was pointless, now... why did you say "Jew York" again?

Here's the new european version that mirrors the version in operation in the United States:

http://cordis.europa.eu/fetch?CALLER=NEW_PROJ_TM&ACTION=D&DOC=2&CAT=PROJ&QUERY=1192420148778&RCN=81479

Objective: The solution proposed in EC FP6 SAFEE (Security of Aircraft in the Future European Environment) and developed by SOFIA, the Flight Reconfiguration Function (FRF), is a technological response of the industry to the social demand of increasing the security i n the air transport after the September 11th terrorist attacks. It is also a technological development coping with the aims of the "Ultra Secure Air Transport System" concept developed by ACARE in its Second Strategic Research Agenda.

As a continuation of the SAFEE works on FRF, SOFIA will design architectures for integrating the FRF system into several typologies of avionics for civil transport aircraft; develop one of this architectures; validate the FRF concept and the means to integrate it in the current ATM; assess the safety of FRF at aircraft and operational (ATC) levels. Therefore FRF will take the control of the aircraft and will manage to safely return it to ground upon a security emergency (e.g. hijacking), disabling the control and command of the aircraft from the cockpit. It will also execute a new flight plan towards a secure airport and land the aircraft at it. The flight plan can be generated in ground or in a military airplane and transmitted to the aircraft, or created autonomously at the own FRF system.

The execution of the new flight plan is autonomously performed by FRF without any control from ground. FRF also allows performing station keeping with a military aircraft. Additionally, SOFIA will investigate the integration of such solution into different airspace environments: current ATM, ASAS/ADS-B, airspace with/without radar coverage, 4D trajectory negotiation... SOFIA will validate FRF by using a platform composed of an ATC facility and a flight cabin simulator (upgrade of the one used in SAFEE SP3) linked, and by performing flight trials with real aircraft. The SOFIA consortium is a well- balanced and skilled set of 9 organizations from 7 countries across Europe, with SME.

Start Date: 2006-09-01 End Date: 2009-12-31 Duration: 40 months
Project Status Completed

Europe has this system now.

This has become an epic thread, quite like the epicness of zarathustras story,great work guys this ones beaten the VTV thread by a mile !

Well that was pointless, now... why did you say "Jew York" again?

slip of the finger...note that the "J" key is right next to the "N" key on my keyboard (and on most keyboards) I'll proofread a little better in the future if it keeps you from getting so wound up

>>>>>>>That's quite an idea. Maybe you should pitch that to Boeing.

If they implemented it in all their aircraft would I be able to find no mention of it anywhere ever?

If they implemented it in all their aircraft would I be able to find no mention of it anywhere ever?

maybe?

>>>maybe?

Stop playing games. Why can you find no mention of something you say is widespread and well known anywhere to show me any evidence this exists and that everyone talks about the subjects as if this technology doesn't exist. How is that possible? Why are only you and your friends the only ones who know the "truth"?