Skeptic Project

Another thing I'd like to point out to Plautus Satire is that in his link,

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO408B.html</p>

the experts made these comments,

""Wireless communications networks weren't designed for ground-to-air communication. Cellular experts privately admit that they're surprised the calls were able to be placed from the hijacked planes, and that they lasted as long as they did. They speculate that the only reason that the calls went through in the first place is that the aircraft were flying so close to the ground"

and

"it was almost a fluke that the [9/11] calls reached their destinations... From high altitudes, the call quality is not very good, and most callers will experience drops. Although calls are not reliable, callers can pick up and hold calls for a little while below a certain altitude"

Neither of these comments state the calls (from cells, not Air phones) were impossible just that they were surprised, the quality would not be very good and that the calls would have had a predisposition to be dropped due to the tech of the day.

Neither of these comments state the calls (from cells, not Air phones) were impossible just that they were surprised, the quality would not be very good and that the calls would have had a predisposition to be dropped due to the tech of the day.

Clearly these people were believing the official fables about phone calls. Their surprise was predicated on the fact that such calls were impossible.

>>>I don't pretend anything, smoking tobacco ceased all my asthma attacks forthwith<<<

That's funny because quiting smoking stopped my asthma attacks.

That's funny because quiting smoking stopped my asthma attacks.

Second hand smoke always tended to trigger my asthma, not always a full blown "attack" but it always made it hard for me to breathe. Once I started smoking myself, that problem vanished.

"Why is it so hard for you to prove that a system you claim is so widely used, well known and has been around for over a decade exists?"

Children all over the world know there is a widely used and well known system of toy delivery every Christmas Eve.

I don't think I need to provide any more proof than that.

"Did anyone ask me if I was jewish?"

Nope.

Because you're a stupid douchebag whether you're Jewish or not.

>>>> Oh yes, of course, this must surely be a lie. Did anyone ask me if I was jewish?

If I was being accused of being white supremacist I'd be quick to point out I'm black if I was.

>>>Second hand smoke always tended to trigger my asthma, not always a full blown "attack" but it always made it hard for me to breathe. Once I started smoking myself, that problem vanished.<<<

As a lifelong asthmatic and former smoker I call bullshit.

What you're saying is analagous to saying "sulphuric acid always caused severe burns when I rubbed it on my skin but then I drank some and that problem vanished".

>>>Actually, if you read the entire documents in question, it's stated pretty flatly that the calls were impossible, hence the "surprise" at the supposition that they actually took place. That surprise didn't come out of nowhere, it was based on the technological impossibility of such calls.<<<

The links in the article you posted are dead so perhaps you could re-post ones that work.

In the meantime all we can go by is what the article says which is,

""Wireless communications networks weren't designed for ground-to-air communication. Cellular experts privately admit that they're surprised the calls were able to be placed from the hijacked planes, and that they lasted as long as they did. They speculate that the only reason that the calls went through in the first place is that the aircraft were flying so close to the ground"

In which this expert plainly states that s/he speculates the reason the calls were able to take place was because the plane was close to the ground.

If this expert thought the calls were impossible why would s/he speculate on the how it could have happened?

As a lifelong asthmatic and former smoker I call bullshit.

hmm...this doesn't fit with your claims that quitting smoking solved your asthma problem, since your asthma is "lifelong", were you smoking from birth?

If this expert thought the calls were impossible why would s/he speculate on the how it could have happened?

Like I said, they believed the official fables about phone calls. If you think something is impossible, then somebody tells you it happened, if you believe them, you struggle to explain how the impossible could have happened.

Brenda Raney, Verizon Wireless spokesperson, said that RF signals actually can broadcast fairly high. On Sept. 11, the planes were flying low when people started using their phones. And, each call lasted 60 seconds or less.

This is simply not true. If you look at the timeline, most of these hypothetical calls took place when the planes were at altitudes exceeding 8000 feet, when communication with towers would have been absolutely impossible. Again we have a case here of somebody struggling to understand how the impossible could have happened, because they believed a lie. Where are the logs of these calls? Where are recordings of these calls?

>>>hmm...this doesn't fit with your claims that quitting smoking solved your asthma problem, since your asthma is "lifelong", were you smoking from birth?<<<

I see you're well versed in the use of semantics.

My asthma was diagnosed at 3 years of age and I still have it today.

I smoked from the age of about 20 up until about 3 years ago. I smoked for about 20 years in total and quit because I was having regular attacks that I and my doctor attributed to my smoking.

I haven't had an attack in over 2 years and am regularly around other smokers.

You're lying and you know it.

Full stop.

You claim hijackings on 911 were impossible due to the remote control system but no one apart from this random nutjob on the internet knows that.

You also want us to believe the conspirators are stupid enough to design a conspiracy around something that is well known to be impossible so anyone could easily ask why the anti-hijacking devices weren't activated. Lucky for them its so hard to show these devices exist isn't it!

You claim hijackings on 911 were impossible due to the remote control system but no one apart from this random nutjob on the internet knows that.

This is simply not true. Dozens of people that I know personally also know it. That you do not know it is testament to your colossal ignorance.