[ Add Tags ]
[ Return to General Discussion | Reply to Topic ] |
AKBastard | Posted: Feb 08, 2011 - 20:44 |
| ||||
Level: 5 CS Original | More than half of registered voters believe President Obama will lose a bid for a second term, even as more Americans say they approve of his job performance than at any time in more than a year. A new CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey, released Tuesday, shows 51 percent of registered voters, and the same percentage of adult Americans, believe Obama will lose if he runs for re-election. 46 percent say he would win. And more voters say, at the moment, they will vote against Obama. Fully 51 percent say they definitely or probably will not vote for Obama, while 47 percent say they're predisposed to vote for him. Independent voters would vote against Obama by a 44 percent to 53 percent margin, while he would win moderates by a much larger 55 percent to 45 percent margin. The numbers come in the same poll that showed Obama gaining from a big positive bump. The sample of all adults approve of the job Obama is doing by a 55 percent to 44 percent margin, the highest Obama's approval rating has gone since a poll conducted November 13-15, 2009. And yet Obama shouldn't worry too much. Early decisions about how a voter will cast a ballot haven't proven to be terribly good indicators of a candidate's performance in the following elections. A similar CNN survey from January 1995 found 54 percent of Americans saying they would vote against Bill Clinton, while just 39 percent would vote for him. Fully 65 percent said they believed Clinton would lose re-election. Clinton easily won his re-election bid in 1996. The poll, conducted January 21-23 among 1,012 adults, comes with a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percent. Subsamples of 479 Republicans and Republican-leaning independents and 441 Democrats or Democratic-leaning independents have a higher margin of error, around 4.5 percent each. The survey also tested the Republican presidential primary field, a group so disparate and wide open that more than half of Republican primary voters have never heard of some of the leading candidates. More than 59 percent of voters say they have never heard of, or have no opinion of, Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, former Sen. Rick Santorum, former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, Rep. Mike Pence and Sen. John Thune. Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee leads the pack in name recognition with a 72 percent favorable rating. He's closely trailed by former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, who is seen favorably by 70 percent of Republicans, and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who has a 64 percent approval rating. http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2011/02/americans-think.php | |||||
#1 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
Agent Matt | Posted: Feb 08, 2011 - 20:49 |
| ||||
Genuine American Monster Level: 70 CS Original | Riiiiiiight. I imagine Huckabee will be the GOP's nominee, and he doesn't have a chance. Mitt is the GOP's best bet, and he won't win the nomination. If he did, I might be concerned. But Huckabee? Nah. | |||||
#2 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
scitops | Posted: Feb 08, 2011 - 21:29 |
| ||||
Level: 4 CS Original | I disagree. Huckabee will be the best candidate the GOP could put forth. Huckabee is fiscally liberal which will give him appeal. The truth is the GOP field isn't that great. What does it say when their two most intelligent candidates are Mormons? | |||||
#3 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
Ez | Posted: Feb 08, 2011 - 22:13 |
| ||||
Level: 3 CS Original | Hey, atleast Glenn Beck isn't running.. | |||||
#4 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
Agent Matt | Posted: Feb 08, 2011 - 22:38 |
| ||||
Genuine American Monster Level: 70 CS Original | "Huckabee will be the best candidate the GOP could put forth." He's not presidential. At all. Mitt on the other hand, is. I'll be voting for Obama regardless. | |||||
#5 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |
The Burger King | Posted: Feb 08, 2011 - 22:40 |
| ||||
I can't stop posting pictures of poop, what the fuck is wrong with me? Level: 5 CS Original | Doesn't matter Democrats have the strongest base out of all of them. Republicans have Palin. Paultards are loons. Green Party is as good as the bag of shit party. I really don't even know if the tea baggers are a party that has a presidential nominee but who cares (I don't). I think this is how it will play out kind of like the 90's election with Perot except this time you have two more parties playing a big role being the green party and the Paultards who will steal votes from both Republican and Democrats. As Karl Roves is in fact a very bad man he does do his job very well and at that he has says it's not about winning it's winning 51% in county and eventually a reflection on state votes. I really think though it's a little more complicated not much so I would take a stab that if more Independent parties play a bigger roll in the 2012 presidential election even though in reality U.S. presidential election are catered towards just two parties the game plan would change to be get more votes than the next popular party type of game plan. I have a feeling in the 2012 presidential election we're going to see Independent parties play more of a roll but again not a surprising roll as ultimately achieving the status of voting stealing. | |||||
#6 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] |