Skeptic Project

Posted: Feb 05, 2011 - 13:28

(0)

There ARE more sluts in public schools. Shut up and let me explain.

Level: 8
CS Original

Scat is off limits.

#31

Posted: Feb 05, 2011 - 13:31

(0)

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

What's the ethical difference between scat porn and regular porn?

#32

Posted: Feb 05, 2011 - 13:37

(0)

There ARE more sluts in public schools. Shut up and let me explain.

Level: 8
CS Original

The best way to avoid an ethical conversation is to just say it's a "personal limitation."

#33

Posted: Feb 05, 2011 - 13:39

(0)

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Why do you hate freedom?

#34

Posted: Feb 05, 2011 - 13:42

(0)

There ARE more sluts in public schools. Shut up and let me explain.

Level: 8
CS Original

freedom is a zionist plot

#35

Caramel Color

Posted: Feb 05, 2011 - 18:11

(0)

hey sailor

Level: 1
CS Original

As I recall 1 in 4 girls are sexually abused/molested at some point. seems like many professions probably have a high level of abused people. also lol at "porn is a replacement for a girlfriend", couples and women watch porn too.

It's your thang, shake it how you wanna

#36

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=199944

Posted: Feb 05, 2011 - 21:38

(0)

Level: 12
CS Original

A thread at JREF discusses a court ruling that a man with a significantly low IQ should not be having sex because he isn't aware of the risks involved. While not exactly the same, this clashes somewhat with the idea of "It's your thang, shake it how you wanna". I have to believe that at least one porn star at some point in time could've been classified as mentally retarded. Using this court case as precedent, one could argue that the mentally retarded do not have the capability to understand the consequences of acting in porn.

While the discussion so far has assumingly referred to relatively intelligent people, this is one example of society determining fitness to make sexual choices. Also, I don't see how anyone could see porn involving a mentally retarded person as anything but degrading - even if this person chose to partake.

#37

Caramel Color

Posted: Feb 05, 2011 - 21:55

(0)

hey sailor

Level: 1
CS Original

mentally incompetent people cannot consent to being in porn. what does your post have to do with anything? a hypothetical porn star having a low IQ? by all means, let's test every porn star. I demand to see mensa members bang.

Retards can't be in porn anyway, they would rip the dicks off with their gorilla like strength.

#38

Posted: Feb 05, 2011 - 22:00

(0)

Level: 12
CS Original

"Mentally retarded" is defined as having below a 70 IQ (In same states / districts it's 75). There are many people walking around who carry on seemingly normal lives who have below a 70 IQ.

Do not assume someone who's classified as "mentally retarded" is a down-syndrome dependent in a wheel chair.

Your whole "It's your thang, shake it how you wanna" slogan rivals that of Tea Partiers and libertarians.

#39

Posted: Feb 05, 2011 - 22:04

(0)

There ARE more sluts in public schools. Shut up and let me explain.

Level: 8
CS Original

People legally allowed to have sex off camera, having sex on camera, what's hard to understand about this concept?

#40

Posted: Feb 05, 2011 - 22:05

(0)

Level: 12
CS Original

The OP wasn't about whether it is legal.

#41

Caramel Color

Posted: Feb 05, 2011 - 22:11

(0)

hey sailor

Level: 1
CS Original

adults that can fuck on their own time, marry, drive, own guns, and have children should be stopped from fucking on camera. This makes so much sense.

we could just iq test everyone and oh wait

#42

Posted: Feb 05, 2011 - 22:16

(0)

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

"Your whole "It's your thang, shake it how you wanna" slogan rivals that of Tea Partiers and libertarians."

False equivalence fail. No one is discussing economics.

#43

Posted: Feb 05, 2011 - 22:20

(0)

Level: 12
CS Original

Nobody brought up economics.

#44

Posted: Feb 05, 2011 - 22:40

(0)

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

THATS MY POINT BROSEPH

#45

Posted: Feb 05, 2011 - 22:44

(0)

Level: 12
CS Original

Carmel's slogan is comparable to the Tea Party because they're frequently using black and white, simple phrases that mean nothing in the context of reality.

Carmel's slogan is comparable to liberterians because they like the idea of everyone being able to do whatever they want.

#46

Posted: Feb 05, 2011 - 22:58

(0)

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Are we reading the same thread?

#47

Posted: Feb 05, 2011 - 23:00

(0)

Level: 12
CS Original

Why don't you agree with the comparison?

#48

Kaiser Falkner

Posted: Feb 06, 2011 - 10:14

(0)

HAIL HYDRA

Level: 6
CS Original

Aaron's trying to say that "It's your thang, shake it how you wanna" is a statement that parallels libertarian philosophy because it seems to support hyper-individualized freedoms. However, there are a lot of philosophical schools he could have used besides libertarianism and not have created this confusion. it makes sense, just not particularly a moving point. Sorry Aaron, still love ya though.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarianism_(metaphysics)

#49

Posted: Feb 06, 2011 - 10:39

(0)

Level: 12
CS Original

Right back at ya, slick.

#50