Skeptic Project

Your #1 COINTELPRO cognitive infiltration source.

Page By Category

Forum - So Brenton - Page 3

Tags: #pointlesstwittertags [ Add Tags ]

[ Return to General Discussion | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 00:23
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

You're going to tell me the Australian Greens are completely woo free? No anti-vaxxer stuff? No environmental woo? No Truthers?

I'm pretty skeptical.

#61 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 00:26
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

Well there's no political party on earth that's 'free' of truthers etc. In-fact we've had many come mainly from the Labor party. There's no party completely free of any of those things, but none of it can be found in official policy or people with leadership positions.

#62 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 00:32
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Well, since I know you're just "roleplaying" on CS I think its safe to remain skeptical. I see no reason to think it isn't filled with cranks just like any other Green Party.

#63 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 00:34
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

Well, good for you.

#64 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
MuertosPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 01:37
(0)
 

Paid Disinformation Blogger

Level: 14
CS Original

So Brenton is still a Zeitgeister, is blackmailing Peter Merola with screenshots that he refuses to show people, wants plastic surgery on his nose, confuses utilitarianism with socialism, refuses to admit he's wrong, twists definitions beyond recognition, and thinks Julian Assange is worthy of a Nobel Peace Prize.

Wow. Just...wow.

#65 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 02:14
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

I'm not blackmailing anyone with them. He knows exactly what's in them and I've concluded in discussion with others that the screenshots are completely insignificant. Of course getting plastic surgery is just sooo wrong - I'm only an artist, god why would I need that!? I'm not confused about them at all, as I said, I took a position of argument for the purpose of taking a position of argument and nothing more (not to mention that I confirmed that I was wrong in that very socialism thread - not to mention that I knew from the beginning how wrong I was because this issue of socialism - egalitarianism - etc was covered as a main study area when I studied philosophy in VCE and got an above state average score for ... if I cared enough I could scan some of my writings from that course online but I don't) and of course it's so pathetic of me to suggest Assange should get the peace prize even though many countries have suggested as such - oh gee, Muertos.

#66 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
The Burger KingPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 07:28
(0)
 

I can't stop posting pictures of poop, what the fuck is wrong with me?

Level: 5
CS Original

I may go off topic here a little bit but I never said to myself that I'll never work with certain people until I came upon the Zeitgeist Movement. One person I said i'll never work with because this person is just not trust worthy is a guy named Anarchy. Anarchy is just a idiot that from the beginning I knew is no good. I thought to myself that I hope he bothers someone else besides me, which he did. Anarchy eventually caused chaos on TZM IRC and did some horrible stuff, he tried to include me in such behavior even telling me the server he wanted me to crack, and os course I simply said no to the guy as that is not who I am. Anarchy is a individual that if I had a choice I'd never work with at al; that if I was a TZM admin or mod I'd never let the guy back in the group at all cost. Luckily it's not up to me.

Benton I feel falls into the same category as someone I'd never work with. I feel Brenton is the type of person who is waiting in the shadows to backstab someone. I can't believe the guy was going to release material or better yet blackmail Peter for Power or something, that is simply wrong on many levels. I may not like what someone does including Peter Merola but black mailing is just so wrong that the person saying or committing the act of blackmail has to be a very uncompassionate person. I even donate to VTV because I feel bad for the guy on many levels but the biggest reason would be that he has kids that if I and others don't donate are going to starve and freeze and that sucks because the father won't get a job to take care of them. Brenton I suppose to me your a very ugly person in the inside and no amount of plastic surgery or makeup is ever going to cover that up.

Lets just put it this way I'd rather work with a Peter, a VTV, or a Tanktop than a Brenton or a Anarchy.

#67 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 08:11
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

I can't believe the guy was going to release material or better yet blackmail Peter for Power or something, that is simply wrong on many levels.

It had nothing to do with power whatsoever, no matter how much anyone wants to claim it.

I did make a statement at one point in discussion with this website's founder and others that it'd be nice to create a social organisation with virtually the same aims, to bring in the progressives from the ZM - which was at a time when I did not see it as progressive at all and was (yes) antagonistic to it. But that's still a far stretch from me suggesting such a silly idea as 'lets overthrow peter' or something like that - something I never suggested. Ever.

I have no need to be attractive to you, and all I'll say is that plastic surgery & make-up have absolutely nothing to do with my perceived personal desire to be attractive. It's because I want to work in the media industry, in the sense of being in the public eye - and the more "perfect" you appear the more likely you are to succeed - period.

"Perfection" is going to be the philosophy of my media career.

That's really all I need to say to the above.

#68 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 09:41
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

"I'm not blackmailing anyone with them."

No, not any more. You're right.

But you were for quite some time.

Besides, I thought you weren't commenting on the screen shots. I don't think you can keep your stories straight since you lie so much.

#69 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 09:50
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

There was never any form of black-mail with them because nobody was under threat as a result of them. For something to be black-mail, the "endangered party" (so to speak) has to be endangered by actions that would be labelled as 'black-mail'. Blackmail is not the word.

I'm not commenting on them. I'm talking about them. To comment on them would be to talk specifically about their contents and/or their implications. Don't bother trying to twist my words.

#70 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 09:55
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

I'm not twisting your words. You're just an absurd liar.

#71 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 10:02
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

You are twisting my words. I'm more than happy to talk about my motivations and previous position regarding those screenshots, what I had thought I might do with them, etc, etc,. But I will not talk about their actual contents (though, I have alluded to them in the past - sure). Pretty clear distinction.

#72 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 10:03
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

I'm sure in your warped mind its a "pretty clear distinction."

#73 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 10:07
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

Yeah my mind is so warped I only see one of Australia's best clinical psychologist/psychotherapist - who I went to because I actually thought that I might have a major problem, but nope - who has pronounced the exact opposite about my mind. But whatever. You know me better than a highly trained professional, right?

#74 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 10:10
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

I thought you didn't take this forum seriously. Why are you laying out your medical history as an argument?

You're one fucked up dude, Brenton. I don't think you exist in any semblance of reality.

#75 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 10:13
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

I'm happy to lay out my medical history because I don't even need to have confidence about my own stability, I KNOW that I am and any bullshit from you to the contrary is just that - bullshit.

#76 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 10:13
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Brenton Eccles: Truly a legend in his own mind.

#77 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 10:14
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

Not at all. Perfectly stable? Yes.

#78 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 10:17
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Yeah....

#79 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 10:18
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

This is just descending.

#80 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 10:19
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

How does needing financial assistance because you've spent your money on drugs equate to perfect stability?

#81 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 10:21
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

Oh, right, well since you bring that up. I'm on financial assistance because I'm a student. That's a given in Australia. And by the way drug use isn't a sign of instability unless it results detrimental circumstances, period.

#82 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 10:23
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

I thought you were done with this discussion.

"And by the way drug use isn't a sign of instability unless it results detrimental circumstances, period."

So in Australia the sign of stability is using your government dole for drugs?

#83 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 10:26
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

I thought you were done with this discussion.

Well I was until you gave me a reason to add something. I'm not going to give you the last word if it's full of shit.

Do you even know how much student allowance in this country is? Do you know how cheap marijuana is here? Not exactly leaving me starving or unable to pay my bills, put it that way.

Do remember that I'm living in the strongest Western economy on the planet.

I just love this. You've mentioned yourself that you've used drugs, yet it's okay for you to attack me for using them. #doublestandard

#84 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 10:30
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

No, its not a double standard because you don't work for the money you are using to purchase the drugs. You are using government assistance money to pay for drugs and you don't even see a problem with it.

That speaks volumes about your sense of entitlement. You bitch about inequality and poverty, yet you piss government assistance money away on drugs. You're a fraud and a liar.

#85 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 10:32
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

Of course I see a problem with it, and in-fact the majority of the money I have spent on marijuana was not government money. I'm allowed to work alongside getting student allowance, FYI. In any case haven't used any drugs for quite some time, and I've only been on student allowance since November. I don't know why I'm bothering to justify myself. Whatever.

#86 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 10:34
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

I can't imagine why anyone would believe a word you say. How many times have you claimed you were done with a discussion or you didn't take a discussion seriously only to come back two minutes later discussing the issue seriously.

You're just a fraud, Brenton.

#87 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 10:35
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

This is only the second discussion I've come back to. You love putting me in this position. Getting me to say I'm done. Then when I do that you say something that you know will trigger a response out of me because it pisses me off. You're very very very good at being a troll, Matt.

#88 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 10:36
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Its my fault you're inconsistent and can't keep your stories straight?

While I may be a very, very, very good troll you're very, very, very bad at accepting responsibility for your own actions. Again, it speaks volumes about your sense of entitlement.

You're just a fraud Brenton. A fraud with a severely warped moral compass.

#89 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 23, 2011 - 10:41
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

My story is entirely straight. I don't give a damn if you don't believe me because I don't need you to (God, I've said that too many times). My response is simple: do you honestly think that I'd project my realistic personality on a website like this, with dangerous individuals such as yourself on here? I mean I really would be insane if I did that.

#90 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]