Page By Category
Forum - NIST specifically tested bomb and demolition hypotheses in WTC towers modeling.
[ Add Tags ]
| [ Return to 9/11 Can | Reply to Topic ] |
| Muertos | Posted: Dec 12, 2010 - 11:31 |
| ||||
 Paid Disinformation Blogger Level: 14 CS Original | http://conspiraciesrnotus.blogspot.com/2010/12/nist-tested-bomb-demolition-hypotheses.html</p> So, the NIST did exactly what Twoofers wanted...they wasted our tax dollars investigating woo subjects and CTs, and found nothing to them. Funny you don't hear more from the Twoofers about this. For example I seriously doubt this piece of information will make it into Merola's Zeitgeist 3. | |||||
| #1 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] | |||||
| Agent Matt | Posted: Dec 12, 2010 - 11:58 |
| ||||
 Genuine American Monster Level: 70 CS Original | But NIST is part of the conspiracy, therefore they are only covering up the conspiracy. | |||||
| #2 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] | |||||
| The Real Roxette | Posted: Dec 12, 2010 - 13:18 |
| ||||
 There ARE more sluts in public schools. Shut up and let me explain. Level: 8 CS Original | Very cool stuff. While it won't stop the true believers, it'll help prevent some new converts, I hope. Anyone else downloading this? | |||||
| #3 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] | |||||
| Muertos | Posted: Dec 12, 2010 - 13:25 |
| ||||
Paid Disinformation Blogger Level: 14 CS Original | I always keep an arsenal of anti-conspiracy links and files to throw at Twoofers. Like Matt pointed out this will just be denounced by the true believers as gubbermint cover-up, but it might be useful to throw at people who say we need a "new investigation"--well, we had it, they investigated exactly what you wanted, and came up with nothing. | |||||
| #4 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] | |||||
| The Real Roxette | Posted: Dec 12, 2010 - 13:26 |
| ||||
There ARE more sluts in public schools. Shut up and let me explain. Level: 8 CS Original | It's been said a bunch of times on this site: unless the "new investigation" comes up with the conspiracy theorist results, it will always be considered a cover up. | |||||
| #5 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] | |||||
| Sil the Shill | Posted: Dec 12, 2010 - 16:54 |
| ||||
 Level: 9 CS Original | Speaking of nails in the coffin that is the truther movement... http://www.sott.net/articles/show/212302-Wanted-by-the-CIA-The-man-who-keeps-no-secrets</p> "I'm constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud." -Julian Assange Clearly he is now part of the conspiracy since he does not tow the conspiracy line. | |||||
| #6 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] | |||||
| Ed | Posted: Dec 12, 2010 - 17:27 |
| ||||
Level: 10 CS Original | HA! This is interesting. Im arguing with a truther over youtube PM's right now that said NISt didn't test for explosives. He also started out claiming NIST didn't consider bombs in WTC7 because he said that NIST said that several huge explosions would be heard when their own theory only required one column taken out, rather than all those explosives and therefore would require only one explosive. Basically he was saying that NIST discounted explosives at WTC7 based on a strawman only here's the thing. 1. NISt specifically DID calculate the smallest possible explosive capable of cutting ONE column and calculated it to be loud enough that it would have been easily picked up on a microphone. 2. His was argument that many explosives were installed in WTC7 anyway! Yet he wanted to say that NIST's assessment of one small explosive was too loud AND his explosives would be quieter despite requiring MANY of them. He is quite a character... He is someone who also said the dust cloud from the collapse could have muffled the explosive used. He also said that you could make a silencer for a high explosive, because you can use them for guns. He also insists that all demolitions create "pyroclastic clouds", when I asked him for evidence of this and why no one was burnt he ignored me and claims he never said the dust cloud was hot, so literally he used the word for no reason whatsoever other than other truthers do, again, for no reason. He also thinks a high explosive can destroy heavy steel, burn peoples skin off but not rupture anyone's ear drums. Sorry, had to vent a bit, he is one of the most idiotic truthers I've ever debated :D | |||||
| #7 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] | |||||
| The Real Roxette | Posted: Dec 12, 2010 - 18:37 |
| ||||
There ARE more sluts in public schools. Shut up and let me explain. Level: 8 CS Original | Oh my god that's hilarious | |||||
| #8 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] | |||||
| AKBastard | Posted: Dec 13, 2010 - 18:37 |
| ||||
 Level: 5 CS Original | This blog is fantastic. | |||||
| #9 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] | |||||