Skeptic Project

Your #1 COINTELPRO cognitive infiltration source.

Page By Category

Forum - Dr. Peter Joseph Merola says the venus project don't need no Math-O-Matics

[ Add Tags ]

[ Return to General Discussion | Reply to Topic ]
The Burger KingPosted: Oct 30, 2010 - 19:29
(0)
 

I can't stop posting pictures of poop, what the fuck is wrong with me?

Level: 5
CS Original

This statement alone is just ridiculous. Peter Merola is just say mathematics need not apply to the venus project and RBE it will just work somehow. He's asking people to just believe like a excuse is a dogma belief which is definitely not the scientific method.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

http://thezeitgeistmovement.com/joomla/index.php?option=com_kunena&Itemid=99999&func=view&catid=229&id=297097#297108

>>somedude says: TVP's lack of a mathematical model.<<

>> Peter Merola responds: There is no lack of mathematical model when you understand what math communicates. The model/parameters are self-evident based on the goal of Peak Efficiency/Peak Preservation; hence Peak Sustainably. Yes- I could create a 19th century linear algebraic model with yzx variables to show component relationships and thresholds - but it would be gigantic - we are talking about millions of calculated variables when you break down the model to its component parameters through industry sects.

That isn't needed and it would take a special computer program to even begin such orientation, thoroughly. The point is that for the sake of our purposes here- getting the public to understand the basic foundation of the system and why it is arranged as such - the technical specifics are not required or relevant. The technicals are not the problem at all.

...it is like trying to define a car by describing the 1000s of processes/parts intrinsically moving within it. It isn't needed to understand the logic of what a car does and why.

...as an aside- I'm so tired of the strawman ignorance in assumption that a RBE cannot be held true until every variable known to compose it is defined and modeled. There is no such thing. It is emergent like any natural system. The specifics and problems therein would be overcome/resolved on a per case basis and there could never be a problem within the system itself which could void the logic of the model as a whole. Nothing- there is not one viable argument in existence that overrides the core foundation of strategic resource management and direct application of the most proven, efficient technology for sustainably/preservation/efficiency... if our goal is optimized human survival. <<

#1 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Edward L WinstonPosted: Oct 30, 2010 - 19:45
(0)
 

President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho: porn star and five-time ultimate smackdown wrestling champion!

Level: 150
CS Original

Peter Merola responds: There is no lack of mathematical model when you understand what math communicates. The model/parameters are self-evident based on the goal of Peak Efficiency/Peak Preservation; hence Peak Sustainably. Yes- I could create a 19th century linear algebraic model with yzx variables to show component relationships and thresholds - but it would be gigantic - we are talking about millions of calculated variables when you break down the model to its component parameters through industry sects.

Translates to "so as you can see, 11 does in fact equal 12."

#2 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
MuertosPosted: Oct 30, 2010 - 20:07
(0)
 

Paid Disinformation Blogger

Level: 14
CS Original

That's too complicated for me. I'm just a monkey who flings poop.

#3 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Oct 30, 2010 - 20:16
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

"Peter Merola responds: There is no lack of mathematical model when you understand what math communicates. The model/parameters are self-evident based on the goal of Peak Efficiency/Peak Preservation; hence Peak Sustainably. Yes- I could create a 19th century linear algebraic model with yzx variables to show component relationships and thresholds - but it would be gigantic - we are talking about millions of calculated variables when you break down the model to its component parameters through industry sects.

That isn't needed and it would take a special computer program to even begin such orientation, thoroughly. The point is that for the sake of our purposes here- getting the public to understand the basic foundation of the system and why it is arranged as such - the technical specifics are not required or relevant. The technicals are not the problem at all.

...it is like trying to define a car by describing the 1000s of processes/parts intrinsically moving within it. It isn't needed to understand the logic of what a car does and why.

...as an aside- I'm so tired of the strawman ignorance in assumption that a RBE cannot be held true until every variable known to compose it is defined and modeled. There is no such thing. It is emergent like any natural system. The specifics and problems therein would be overcome/resolved on a per case basis and there could never be a problem within the system itself which could void the logic of the model as a whole. Nothing- there is not one viable argument in existence that overrides the core foundation of strategic resource management and direct application of the most proven, efficient technology for sustainably/preservation/efficiency... if our goal is optimized human survival."

http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/3474/iheartwords.jpg" />

#4 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
anticultistPosted: Oct 30, 2010 - 20:55
(0)
 

Brainwashing you for money

Level: 15
CS Original

mathematical modelling by merola for the RBE

#5 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Edward L WinstonPosted: Oct 30, 2010 - 21:02
(0)
 

President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho: porn star and five-time ultimate smackdown wrestling champion!

Level: 150
CS Original

Sir, you drastically underestimate our poop throwing capabilities.

#6 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]