Skeptic Project

Your #1 COINTELPRO cognitive infiltration source.

Page By Category

Forum - Sun Moves 1 Degree In 3 Days After Solstice

[ Add Tags ]

[ Return to General Discussion | Reply to Topic ]
KingDavid8Posted: Sep 08, 2010 - 19:14
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

Here's a claim made by Zeitgeist:

"And after this time (the winter solstice) on December 25th, the Sun moves 1 degree, this time north, foreshadowing longer days, warmth, and Spring. And thus it was said: the Sun died on the cross, was dead for 3 days, only to be resurrected or born again."

The one bit I'm wondering about (that CS's response to part 1 didn't address) was the claim that the sun "moves 1 degree" in the three days between the solstice (the 22nd) and December 25th. Since the sun moves from -23.5 degrees on the winter solstice to +23.5 degrees on the summer solstice, totaling about 47 degrees, I find it hard to believe that the sun can move a full degree in the three days after the solstice, when it's moving its slowest. Does anyone know how much it actually does move in the three days after the solstice? I tried googling the answer, but can't find anything but other Christ-myther websites that repeat the "1 degree" claim. Any help would be appreciated.

#1 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Edward L WinstonPosted: Sep 08, 2010 - 19:27
(0)
 

President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho: porn star and five-time ultimate smackdown wrestling champion!

Level: 150
CS Original

The sun actually never stops moving, it really depends on where you are on Earth at how many degrees the sun changes, and the closer it gets to the maximum or minimum degrees the slower it seems to get. I'm not sure if that answers your question, but it's going to be different in the Middle East and in Europe where the apparent "theft" happened between.

#2 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
KingDavid8Posted: Sep 09, 2010 - 06:25
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

It seems to me that the number of degrees the sun changes would be the same no matter where on Earth you are. Its relative starting and stopping points will be different, of course, but the relative "change" will be the same. It seems to me that if you were on the equator and watched as the sun appeared to move a single degree north, someone in, say, Rome will also have seen the sun move a single degree north. He just would have seen it happen closer to the horizon than you did. Am I wrong about this?

#3 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
KingDavid8Posted: Sep 09, 2010 - 21:49
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

I think I have this one cleared up, and Zeitgeist is, once again, wrong. I found a "solar position calculator" at http://www.srrb.noaa.gov/highlights/sunrise/azel.html<br /> It doesn't do BC, but if I plug the info in for 1 AD (I did high noon in Jerusalem), I get:
On 12/22/01, the sun was at -23.69 degrees.
On 12/23/01, the sun was at -23.68 degrees
On 12/24/01, the sun was at -23.66 degrees
On 12/25/01, the sun was at -23.63 degrees
So the total movement for those three days is .06 degrees, not 1 degree as Zeitgeist claims.
I did find a Zeitgeist-defending site that used the "Azimuth" (position relative to due north), but its own information showed a difference of just over .01 degrees.

#4 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
duncanlecombrePosted: Sep 09, 2010 - 23:12
(0)
 

Level: 2
CS Original

zeitgiest logic would claim that everything we have been told about calculating the suns position has been manipulated by he government LOL.

#5 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]