Skeptic Project

Your #1 COINTELPRO cognitive infiltration source.

Page By Category

Forum - Romney: "The fed is audited."

[ Add Tags ]

[ Return to General Discussion | Reply to Topic ]
sorryPosted: Aug 06, 2010 - 20:21
(0)
 

Level: 12
CS Original

Romney steps up, hits a home run, and is subsequently boo'd and hiss'd by a bunch of idiots.

http://www.dailypaul.com/node/141796

#1 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
KeppPosted: Aug 06, 2010 - 20:37
(0)
 

Level: 5
CS Original

Ridley is an idiot I have seen him many times around here annoying the hell out of people, especially cops.

#2 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
sorryPosted: Aug 07, 2010 - 11:32
(0)
 

Level: 12
CS Original

I can't believe I bothered to get involved in the comments.

AaronMHatch
Romney is 100% correct.

cowboy1165
@AaronMHatch

You and Romney couldn't be more wrong, but you wear your chains very proudly.

AaronMHatch
@cowboy1165 How are we wrong? Is the fed not audited already? Or are you saying that it is audited, but it's fraudulent because the committee who does it is corrupt? If you're saying the latter, then Romney and I are still correct.

TheEbonicslover
@AaronMHatch reads like you're a thief and a criminal to me.

AaronMHatch
@TheEbonicslover How?

TheEbonicslover
@AaronMHatch you're not that dumb, are you? You just pretend to be dumb, right?

AaronMHatch
4 minutes ago
@TheEbonicslover Enlighten me, please.

TheEbonicslover
@AaronMHatch I already have... criminal.

AaronMHatch
@TheEbonicslover Can you explain why I'm a criminal?

TheEbonicslover
@AaronMHatch did you read my first response to your criminal statement? Read it again if you haven't.

AaronMHatch
@TheEbonicslover this one? "reads like you're a thief and a criminal to me." How does it read like a thief and a criminal? Please explain.

#3 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
KeppPosted: Aug 07, 2010 - 11:39
(0)
 

Level: 5
CS Original

Now when I go back and read the nonsense of Ron Paul websites and such, I give myself a much deserved face palm. I can't believe I fell for that shit.

#4 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
sorryPosted: Aug 07, 2010 - 11:48
(0)
 

Level: 12
CS Original

Agreed

#5 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
sorryPosted: Aug 07, 2010 - 21:55
(0)
 

Level: 12
CS Original

Another guy has issues:

johnjen5321
22 minutes ago
@AaronMHatch HONEST??? The Fed? Bernanke? Surely you jest!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! ROTFLMAO .....

AaronMHatch
13 minutes ago
@johnjen5321 What is your background in political science?

johnjen5321
10 minutes ago
@AaronMHatch What is YOUR background on the Fed? If you do not understand that it is THE CAUSE of our troubles and is blatantly unconstitutional (and hence should be abolished on those grounds alone) then please go read The Creature From Jekyll Island. This has nothing to do with "political science" ... just prosperity without the fed as the Framers intended!

AaronMHatch
7 minutes ago
@johnjen5321 Are you against public schools?

johnjen5321
1 minute ago
@AaronMHatch Again, please educate yourself further. No, I am not against public schools, per se, but the Federal government has NO business regulating or funding them. All funding for any community's public schools should come from a localized source of tax revenue within that community. This question has nothing to do with ending the Fed, either.

AaronMHatch
1 second ago
@johnjen5321 Its relevance to the Fed is that you support private operation of schools; the Fed is also privately operated. It seems strange that you would support private schools but not a private central bank. This must suggest that you don't think a central bank is necessary. And that, my friend, is why I asked what your background in political science is. For having a background would qualify you as having a valid opinion on why we should or should not have a central bank. Have a good day.

#6 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
advancedatheistPosted: Aug 07, 2010 - 22:00
(0)
 

Level: 3
CS Original

You wonder why libertarians want to use the power of the state to violate the property rights of the Federal Reserve System's allegedly private owners.

#7 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
sorryPosted: Aug 07, 2010 - 22:33
(0)
 

Level: 12
CS Original

His reply:

@AaronMHatch No, I do not think we need a central bank, and whether I do or not has nothing to do with any political background. One does not need a background in "political science" to study the fed and its policies and make up his/her own mind as to whether or not it should remain or not. That is absolutely idiotic. My opinion on this is as valid as anybody else's who has spent the last 3 solid years studying economics-the field that is RELEVANT to the Fed-not "political science." good day EOF

Of course, economics is not the reason why the Fed is hated. It is hated for political reasons. I won't tell him that or respond again. Clowns.

#8 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
KeppPosted: Aug 08, 2010 - 09:03
(0)
 

Level: 5
CS Original

Hating the federal reserve is the lazy mans way of thinking he knows more about economics than even expert economists.

#9 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
sorryPosted: Aug 08, 2010 - 10:26
(0)
 

Level: 12
CS Original

Paul supporters use economics as an excuse for their political beliefs.

#10 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]