Skeptic Project

OK so theres a dispute about WTC7 freefall argument, whos got the business to argue with this ?

I am no engineering or architectural expert, this guys line of thinking is definitely controlled demolition, but hes using the freefall argument.

Yes I am saying it becasue it happened. Anyone with an understanding of distance / time will say the same.

Free fall is so undeniable and unequivocal that NIST has no choice but to recognize it. With your stance on the subject I though you might at the least have read The Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 . http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/PDF/NCSTAR%201A.pdf

But I doubt you will actually read it or have read it. And you are the typical type of moron that disputes the truth(aka anyone with a brain) of the event.

Now I know you might say he is quoting a source (NIST)that he says is lying... But distance / time is something that is true (not theory) regardless of the source.

We all agree that free fall occured. (exept you CT"Killer") lol

But like you say... "Freefall implies no resistance, the buildings dont fall at free fall speed, none of them. They all have paths of resistance when they fall."

Are you all ears yet??

However, that is exactly what occured... It is FACT not Theory. "Free fall decsent at gravitational acceleration for approximately 8 stories.... 108 ft." http://wtc.nist.gov/media/WTC7Revise...fing111908.pdf .. or check the above

Do you accept the fact (not theory..LOL) that the roof line traveled a distance in time that is equal to free fall speed; with no path of resistance or structural component below? Any person with a brain will.... but hey there is you and you are a person with probably a small brain

This is what will happen.

1. YOu will say yes it happened but there is some "reason" why free fall occured under the circumstances that the building was "damaged" or some other unreasonable explanation fire, water, blah blah blah... Remember Free fall. LOL

2 removed this part it was an irrelevant thing he said not about 911 or wtc7

3. You will say "aww shit you are right." The building was not made from straw, sticks, or bricks. F%%% only air would make the building collapse at that rate. But there wasn't only air so the building and therefore vertical support had to be simultaneously removed for 108 of the building below the roofline.... how did that happen?

4. You will not even respond to the fact (not theory) of free fall and you will change the subject.

5. The thread will die because you and your loser followers have nothing to say now and will stop posting

6. I have no idea. Lets hear it.

FYI.... It was the largest CIA office outside of headquarters, was home to Office Of Emergency Management, Secret Service, Securites and Exchange Commision, I could list more but those 4 are important enough to know that the building was built with great funds and was a strong, secure, and not made of air for free fall to occur building. But I'm sure you already knew that due to your attention to detail

> the building was built with great funds and was a strong, secure, and not made of air

I thought it was built very cheaply and in its day wasn't their complaints that the design was as weak as a kitten and especially designed to be as full of air as possible to maximise rental income..

This is why I prefer earth sheltered buildings that are more resistant to airplanes bashing into them..

haha internet censorship !!! They are working for the man, shills removing dissent !

Its expected man, they dont like people ruining their weird paranoid lifestyle.

http://anticultist.wordpress.com/2010/08/05/sherdog-mma-forum-conspiracy-nutcases/</p>

Posted in Zzzz, Sillies, Comedy
Tags: anti government, comedy, Conspiracy theories, demonic possession, denial, discredited, paranoid delusions, schizophrenic behaviour

Thought I would just commemorate my brief experience with a bit of a poke at them.

hehe you are a witness to it all too so at least we both know its fairly accurate aside from the comedic tone in it. :D

How will the Zionist machine function with enginekid spreading truth!?

As far as the WTC7 freefall speed thing.

The NIST confirms that one corner fell at near free fall for about 2.25 seconds at the beginning of the collapse. This is understandable as about 7 of the lower level floors gave way at once.

I got this answer from dsglop over at youtube, the guy is a topnotch 911 debunker.

Yeah its a shame that we wont get the opportunity to present the case against their failed beliefs.
Its also a shame they had to delete the threads and stop anyone else reading the arguments against them. removing any counter evidence that was presented aginst their CT nonsense.

>> Too bad we were banned before we could post this, now all the CT'ers are probably over there claiming victory.

They'll claim victory regardless, we've had people post here and on the facebook group who load up a post with links and literally say "I WIN!"

!

I can bet you even if they don't sign up that we picked up a few sherdog guys as regular readers.

hah I know hes now posting his nonsense that will never ever get a reply and claiming it to be a triumph when it was never even addressed. If it was he would of had to post yet more nonsense and then the cycle would continue until he called us shills.

And so it goes with CT nutjobs