Submitted By: | Edward L Winston |
Author: | Grace Powers |
Status: | Too Vague |
Source: | Link |
Predicted: | 2009 |
Happens: | Unknown |
Here is the full text of Grace Power's #4 prediction, see the bottom of this prediction for attached photograph.
Royal Cover-up?
Anyone who believes Princess Diana survived the car crash in the Pont d'Alma
tunnel on August 31st, 1997 must be "daft", right? Well, a majority of the
British public must be "daft" because according to the polls, most Brits believe
Diana is alive and in hiding. "Perhaps there was money involved, or perhaps
simply a chance to start a new life away from the press," says Anu Chantha-Doyle,
a staff writer for The London Post. "Who else but the Royal family could give
Diana Spencer a private identity once again."
When news of Diana's alleged death hit the headlines, disbelievers cried foul
and gathered outside Kensington Palace with signs that read "Tell the Truth
about Diana," "Princess Di Lives" and "Where is Lady Di?"
Just six hours before her alleged death, Diana let slip to Daily Mail reporter
Richard Kray that she was about to withdraw completely from public life. It's
been more than a decade since her "departure" and reports that she is alive are
fuelled by the fact that she had no post mortem prior to the burial that took
place at Althorp. In the UK, all victims of sudden death require a post mortem
by law.
There is no question that the mother of the future King Of England had become an
embarrassment to the royal family by dating a Muslim playboy. Some believe that
the British MI6 secret service eliminated her because they considered her a
threat to the throne and the stability of the state.
Plastic Surgery?
Skeptics point out that it would be next to impossible for the most recognized
face in the world to disappear and then resurface without being detected. What
about her children, William and Harry? What chance would she have of coming back
to see them without being noticed? It is inconceivable that Diana would choose
to miss out on the rest of their lives...unless...she underwent dramatic facial
reconstruction through plastic surgery. Not an attractive proposition.
Even if Diana agreed to undergo invasive reconstructive facial surgery in
exchange for her freedom, she would need a new identity to spend time with her
sons. A nanny, perhaps? This is also an unattractive proposition for a princess
who is accustomed to a pampered royal lifestyle.
What promises or conditions enticed Princess Diana to participate in a faked
death scheme? A) She would remain closely and actively involved in the lives of
her sons B) She would undergo only minor plastic surgery C) She would continue
the royal lifestyle she was accustomed to d) She would be free of media
harrassment.
Shared Identity
Prior to Diana's death, a woman popped up quite suddenly in royal circles with
an uncanny likeness to Diana. Her name is Sophie Rhys-Jones and she is
approximately the same age, weight and build as Diana. When Sophie started
dating Prince Charles' youngest brother, Prince Edward, Edward had been dodging
rumors about his homosexual persuasion. His engagement to Sophie helped silence
those rumors.
Only one year after Diana's faked death and plastic surgery, Sophie Rhys-Jones
became engaged to Prince Edward and married him on June 19, 1999. Because of
Sophie's remarkable likeness to Princess Diana, the British and American media
began dubbing her "the new Di" and yet nobody put 2 + 2 together. By marriage,
Sophie is the aunt of Diana's children, William and Harry. As such, she is seen
at public and private functions with them.
Following her "Sophie look-alike surgery", Diana began sharing Sophie's
identity. The "shared identity" made it possible for Diana to masquerade as
Sophie both privately and publicly. She is now free to circulate in royal
circles with her sons posing as their aunt without arousing suspicion and
without harassment from the media. There is only one restriction. Both Sophie
and Diana must coordinate their schedules so that they never appear publicly in
the same place at the same time.
This article is NOT
suggesting that Princess Diana (who is 47 years old now) and Sophie Rhyss-Jones
(who is 44 years old now) are the same person.
If Grace isn't suggesting that, then what the hell is she suggesting? Is this another one of those "Just Asking Questions" things? Would a more logical explanation be that the men in that family just have a thing for blonds with short hair?