Skeptic Project

Your #1 COINTELPRO cognitive infiltration source.

Page By Category

Forum - "Life is Not a Science Fiction Story."

Tags: Jacque Fresco, Venus Project, Zeitgeist Movement [ Add Tags ]

[ Return to General Discussion | Reply to Topic ]
advancedatheistPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 14:35
(0)
 

Level: 3
CS Original

This obviously relates to Venus Project enthusiasm:

Life is Not a Science Fiction Story, by Mike Treder

http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/treder20100211/</p>

Many transhumanists are under the mistaken impression that the world they live in operates like a science fiction novel. It doesn’t.

This cognitive confusion seems to underlie some of the conflicts between moderate technoprogressives, like me, and the more exuberant types who expect that radical, wondrous changes are always just around the corner—because they read it in a book.

Don’t get me wrong. I love reading science fiction. I find it fascinating, compelling, mind-expanding, and occasionally even well-written. But I try to remember the second word in that genre description: fiction.

You see, the real world is not a story. It is not designed to be easily understood, to have a beginning, a middle, and an end. It doesn’t have a moral. It cannot be edited to improve clarity and flow.

The actual world we inhabit is complex, confused, arbitrary, random, chaotic, contingent, and messy. It’s hardly the stuff of a best-selling novel, or at least not the kind that seems to incite such zeal among transhumanists who believe that what they read in a book or saw in a movie must be true.

No, if real life was a science fiction story, it would be very different.

#1 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 15:17
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

The basis of what The Venus Project proposes has been possible for decades. AI, Supercomputing, Nanobots, etc, are irrelevant to it's implementation. It's just that, as history has proven, high-tech improves the standard of living immensely.

The author is, of course, for the most part correct in stating:

Nanotechnology (or bioengineering, or computer intelligence, or whatever) is instead a slow, laborious, painstaking process that features many more failures than successes, many more dead ends than discoveries, and far too many boring, step-by-agonizing-step procedures to make a good novel.

Nobody who supports technocracy, or The Venus Project, would argue the contrary.

The basis of The Venus Project, if you want to talk about the technological side, is already being tested and has been highlighted by Peter J before.

'HP Lab's Central Nervous System for the Earth aims to build a planetwide sensing network'
http://www.hpl.hp.com/news/2009/oct-dec/cense.html</p>

In other words, the most important basis of The Venus Project is incredibly logical: the intelligent management of Earth's resources.
At the present, we don't have it. And, as many of us would contend, it's relatively impossible to have such intelligent management with an economic system that requires perpetual growth and that is not itself based on sustaining the Earth's resources but rather to continually 'rape and run' for profit.

It's not that Capitalism completely fails in terms of looking after the Earth, it does it in some ways, it just doesn't do it well enough. If an Engineer were to look at the mechanism of Capitalism with the requirement that it had to be a system that sustained Earth's resources without depleting them beyond a safe level ... it'd fail.

What The Venus Project proposes is actually very simplistic, but it seems lost on some people how simplistic it is. Have you read the Orientation Guide, if I may ask?

#2 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 15:39
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

"What The Venus Project proposes is actually very simplistic, but it seems lost on some people how simplistic it is."

Yeah, pollyanna concepts are often simple.

What's your point?

#3 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 15:49
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

Are you actually going to engage in serious discussion or are 90% of your posts just intended to derail that?

#4 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 16:31
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

@Brenton,

Ironic coming from someone who dodges every question he can't answer.

Why should I even try to discuss anything with you? You only answer questions that your narrative allows you to and then claim people didn't ask you questions.

Eat shit.

#5 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 16:56
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

You don't ask questions. You make accusations without providing any contention for them. I'm a student of philosophy and I can see right through the way you're trying to argue.

#6 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 17:04
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

@Brenton,

I asked you plenty of questions. Stop being as intellectually dishonest as your guru Joseph.

#7 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 17:14
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

You have not asked more than a handful. Most of which I have answered in one way or another.

#8 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Feb 11, 2010 - 17:38
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

@Brenton,

If you had answered them, I wouldn't be talking to you.

Trust me, I wouldn't. I find you extremely annoying.

#9 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Feb 12, 2010 - 04:22
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

The reason you are talking to me is because I have answered them and you can't stand it.

#10 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Feb 12, 2010 - 07:23
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

@Brenton,

"As Nanos, a member on the ZM forums, has highlighted: there are government funds just waiting for us if we were to get up off our asses and apply for them. The thing is that such a thing requires high organization and specific planning - two things the Movement is not facilitating at all at this time." - Brenton Eccles

"The Movement does have internal leadership. Especially in the cities and towns where the chapter meetings are becoming regular and getting large numbers of folks turning up." - Brenton Eccles

#11 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]