Skeptic Project

You know that forum is the place where PJ's last name was mentioned years ago when his, and there was a long debate about his work back then. (It might be worth looking at that thread if you haven't seen it before..)

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=85264

Amusing that someone so keen on his personal safety never bothered to ask (Or maybe he did ask and they said no!) that particular forum to remove mention of his last name, perhaps a lesson on the importance of googling yourself :-)

Win reply Ed, good work, please keep that guy in check he is such a lying douchebag.

Did you see his racist behaviour pointed out in the video here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzDdwZO8hL4

And then he was pulled up with the follwing about his transparent defense In the comments on the channel at the bottom:
http://www.youtube.com/user/Anon2AllofUs</p>

Voiceofreason:

"Even if it was me, that comment was made about two years ago, my views two years ago are not the same views I hold now."

Anon2allofus:

So it was you then because those were the views you held two years ago and you made the comment

Voiceofreason:
"the plentyoffish account is about 3 years old as well. I had completely forgotten about it until Keith brought it up."

Anon2allofus:
You even know the account more evidence its you

voiceofreason:
"Oh my, he exposed me by using circumstantial evidence and simply insisted it was me."

Anon2allofus
Clearly it is you, your own comments validate it. You are exposing yourself as a rascist. You have just had an account banned for muslim hating. thats another form of racism.

That Voiceofreason is possibly one of the biggest outspoken liars on youtube right now, as well as being the most ignorant defender of fringe CT mentality.

Good work Ed. I'm curious to see his reply to your pretty comprehensive and well-sourced responses to his vague statements.

Actually he is in even more denial that that imo.

I'll probably have time to have it up tomorrow

I just found a lot more old ZG posts by him proving he was a truther I knew he was.

He even denied pictures of WTC7 were of WTC7 because he did not want to accept that debris hit it, over and over and over again. I'll be making a list and checking it twice to shove in his face, im sure he'll manage to peddle away and move his goal posts somehow though.

Just posted Voice of Reasons reply...

My reply to him will be up shortly I just have to format it.

Below is a quote from voiceoftreason I find interesting of him to say about Ruppert

Now if he deliberately ignores all the points made against him and he still purports these claims then he is considered not being credible.

Funny because this is exactly what voiceoftreason does, he denies everything said about him and his claims and continues on, this makes him not credible.

Also this:

As far as Michael Rupert being in Zeitgeist 3... can you actually provide a source for that claim? As far as I remember that he hasn't released any actual information on Zeitgeist 3 other than a few tidbits here and there. None of them regarded Michael Rupert.

Theres a whle thread about it, we have it linked in here too.

yeah Ive seen it before, I knew Peter had said it outright somewhere.

The more animated gifs and off-beat color patterns, the more likely a site is to contain THE TRUTH.

Thanks for the support :)

Any chance this could be moved to the ZGM section? I forgot to select that option when I made the thread :)