Skeptic Project

http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A1MY4PY8UDHCG9/ref=cm_pdp_rev_more?ie=UTF8&sort_by=MostRecentReview#RRVYEEY3REYDH

Reviews Written by
P. merola RSS Feed (New York NY)

37 of 47 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars 911 Omission Report, April 17, 2007
This review is from: The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (Indexed Hardcover, Authorized Edition) (Hardcover)
This report is elaborate fiction. The commission was led under Philip Zelikow, a member of the Bush team by association. He authored a book with
Condoleezza Rice and was the head person in charge of ALL informational distribution and allocation. Members of the commission are on record
describing the power of this individual and dominance of the instigation. This commission was not independent.
Among many absurd omissions and distortions, the first to note is that the Commission doesn't even mention BUILDING NUMBER 7 which fell in 6
seconds, without a plane or jet fuel being involved. The reason they omitted this is because there is no realistic way to describe this collapse other than controlled demolition. Secondly, in order to support the claim that the "pancake collapse" was the phenomenon to define the collapse of the World Trade Center(1 and 2), they say that the core of the buildings were "A HOLLOW STEEL SHAFT". Wrong. The World Trade Center had 47 MASSIVE STEEL COLUMNS, which, if a "pancake" collapse had occurred, would have been sticking up in the air after the floors had fallen. Thirdly, the commission totally omits incriminating evidence and testimony such as William Rodriguez, an employee of the WTC for 20yrs. He explains to them that he experienced an explosion in the basement 3-4 seconds before the the first plane hit, and while he was rescuing people in the tower, he heard and felt dozens of explosions in the building before the collapse. There are well over 50 documented accounts of firefighters/witnesses and rescue workers who say they saw and heard massive explosions coming from the buildings. They also don't include testimony by Norman Mineta (Former Secretary of Transportation), who describes how Cheney was in the Emergency bunker under the White House at 9:25... many min before the Pentagon was struck. His testimony dictates that Cheney was in charge of NORAD shoot down orders and was aware Flight 77 as far as 50 miles. The 911 commission claims Cheney wasn't in the White House till after 10am. You can see Mineta's testimony on Cspan coverage. The 911 Comm. just lies about it. Fourth, Bush and Cheney testified together, not under oath, no recording and any notes had to be approved by the White House before leaving the room.
Bare in mind, only 14 million was spent on this investigation while 100 million was spent on Clinton sexual escapades. This panel was as credible
and accurate as the Warren commision. I could go on for pages...

He does that CRAZY CAPS thing hardcore nut jobs do. Oh, well, wait, I guess it makes sense then.

You think when he goes to a fast food restaurant he orders food like:

PJ: Yes, I'd like to have a CHEESE burger with a MASSIVE DRINK.
Clerk: Would you like fries with that?
PJ: WRONG. And no PANCAKES

Dear God, It's me Peter.

I don't know if you're up there, and you're probably just an Atlantian sun-god ripoff, but if you're listening, please, let my forum change the world.

Whoa, he actually admitted he was wrong about something.

"This section is 45% of the entire film and contains a sea of data, some of which, sadly, came from bad sources and I didn't know better at the time. For example, an otherwise reliable text I used which sourced the quote from Pres Wilson, post Federal Res Act, was incorrect. It had it at 1916 - when it was 1913, before the Fed Act. This is replaced. Also Louis Mcfadden, while having multiple attempts on his life and was found to be likely poisoned near the end of his life, recovered from this and lived a while longer. This was another bad source- Removed."

Is what I was referring to.

Ah ok he does admit that was wrong on a couple of points then, wow. In all these years that is the first time I have ever seen him admit any errors.

I started a new thread about it:
http://conspiracyscience.com/forums/topic/zgm-topic-peter-joseph-on-911-and-new-version-of-zeitgeist

PJ is known for using a lot of big words to make himself sound mighty, but he just sounds more ridiculous in my opinion, because as you said, he's just bad at it.

Not that I'm good, my grammar is terrible.

He often makes words up, he used monetaryism instead of monetarism, and then proceeded to define what he meant with his new invented word. This is in his recorded lectures and powerpoint handouts. Perhaps it may even be in his field guide to becoming a cult member.

"Informational distribution and allocation"

Hehe yea thats classic PJ.

He takes this kind of thing to new levels in Addendum and the Orientation Guide.

Needs more WRONG. PANCAKES.