Skeptic Project

If he's actually being serious then this is kind of impressive, in the sense that the Movement has forever just been deflective about it's problem. Blaming other people, etc, etc,. If he actually tries to deal with any of the real issues, then I'm surprised. Doesn't mean I'll support them again, but it is interesting & surprising:

Friends,
Those that have listened to my radio shows might have remembered me commenting many times on the fact that when it came to attacks we have experienced in the past: "we haven't seen anything yet".

The bored, petty bloggers and various hatefilled individuals of who have wasted their time creating anti-z/anti-peter joseph sites and videos are about to be royally trumped by a mainstream media onslaught that will bring the definition of attack/propaganda into a whole new light.

I have been contacted by CNN, NBC, FOX, ABC, AP, Yahoo! and many national/local/international news agencies regarding the comment by Zack Osler referencing a TWO YEAR OLD association of my first film and Jared Loughner. The parroting of this painfully unscientific and idiotic association has resonated across all mainstream outlets. As of now, I am not engaging them for I want the new film to be released before anything.

After the film is released, I have a feeling we are going to see a huge backlash. The stage has been set... and I want all members to hold strong. Don't let any of this get to you. This is exactly what I have been expecting with regard to the media introduction of TZM and it is long overdue. If it wasn't the AZ shootings it would have been another scapegoat. Just as Wikileaks is now associated with a "rapist"- the Z films and hence the Movement/myself are going to be publicly pegged to "mass murder". This is how the game works and I plan to do a radio show on the history of propaganda in the near future to discuss this historical phenomenon.

After the release, I am going to established a large PR campaign for all press interactions from the Movement and TZM is going to explode with interest.

"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win."
-- Mahatma Gandhi

I find it weird that he says he was expecting this. Does he mean that he was expecting a person, who became Jared, to do what he did - or is he just saying he expecting that the first major coverage of the Movement would be an attempt to (from their point of view) demonise it?

Also, it might explode with interest - but can they have any certainty at all that it'll be the kind of positive, proactive interest that they need?

SPOCK YOU LOOK SO HARD AND CHISELED

"TWO YEAR OLD", didn't he just re-release it and also accompany it with a 220 page source guide? He may be regretting this now, because it updates the association to FOUR MONTHS.

"I have been contacted by CNN, NBC, FOX, ABC, AP, Yahoo! and many national/local/international news agencies regarding the comment by Zack Osler referencing a TWO YEAR OLD association of my first film and Jared Loughner."
I really don't think so; except for the the Good Morning America interveiw I have seen nobody reporting about the Zeitgeist film and Jared Loughner. That is because the Zeitgeist Movement is not even on the medias radar and they don't matter.

I call bullshit on Dr. Peter Joseph Merola on many levels and let me break this down. I applaud the dramatics the guys brings he definitely knows how to motivate people with fear being him himself a conspiracy theorists they often know how to evoke fear within people as a strong motivator and this is exactly what he is using so people do not see the obviously flaws he currently and always will possess. I doubt he's been contacted by any media sources or he'd jump at a interview after the months I've heard of people saying hey Peter Merola if you get you a spot on ABC would you take it and Peter (probably frothing at the mouth for attention) said a obvious yes.

It's not the fact that he's not doing the interviews it's the fact he was never asked to do a interview in the first place and we can come back to the Charles Robinson video where Peter Merola basically did a self-interview on himself to see what scum tactics this individual uses. Peter is using a fear monger tactic much like his TZM videos to produce a environment of fear within his cult community because the more fear that is within TZM their is more motivation and less self-reflection on the obvious flaws of his movement. Peter is insulting a individuals intelligence by using such tactics as i personally believe that he thinks EVERYBODY is stupid include the people in his cult movement and he has to HEARD the sheep to his cause so he can be their savior.

Let's just put this out in the open for everybody to see. I think Dr. Peter Joseph Merola is a loon. After watching Matt's video on psychopaths and being a medical student who has two more years of schooling left (1 down so far) I think Peter Merola falls under the category of a psychopath. Their are all sorts of different psychopaths even many in political office and Peter is one of them. Peter lies, deceives, and a obvious one does not admit when he's wrong (never admits). He is using this mainstream media thing to create again a fear monger environment and is self-admitted that he no longer deems blogs, facebooks and other things as a threat now or a lesser threat... The thing is Peter is creating this what I would define hostile conspiracy theorist environment and no one else is.

As far as Peter and his ego he's comparing himself to wikileaks which is a bit funny because most who have an IQ who know little about wikileaks know that wikileaks isn't associated with rapists that a individual called Julian Assange is noted as the "rapist" I think on CS we make note of this when Julain Assange was going to be paid 1.5 million to write a biography about himself we had said that he'll have a write to write about mostly about "one upon a time I uploaded documents and raped a girl the end". In that the Zeitgeist Movement "who has no leaders" has a loon in it called Peter Merola (who si the obvious leader) who makes movies with 1/16 of the truth and passes it off as the truth, only tells one side of the story and not the other side and uses fear monger tactics to get people motivated to do his bidding. So no wikileaks isn't associated with rapists just Julian Assange, but you are current and seem to want to revel in the fact that the Zeitgeist Movement is associated with murders at which associates them as being a cult.

I find it funny that Peter is loving this right now this is all he could hope and dream which is to revel in the fact of the negative attention he's getting he loves this type of stuff boys and girls he simply loves it. At that although I think this is the worst thing he could possibly do and say ever because to me his group is official a cult that is purely driven on cult like fear mongering tactics, this couldn't be better for Peter Merola. So congratulations Peter you are official a cult.

At that Peter Joseph Merola from what I've known he created most of his what they would deem as enemies and yet somehow this is the fanatic that is going to change the world? This guy is nuts and this is coming from me and I often am on the line of crazy sometimes. From my research on things this Peter Joseph Merola is a L. Ron Hubbard in the making and his Zeitgeist Movement is the next Scientology but even worse.

^ @Here to Kiss it Better, don't blame you XD a abstract of it is Dr. Peter Joseph Merola is a fear mongering psychopath delusional loon.

Why would he even turn down a chance for an interview? Shouldn't he use it as a way to promote the new movie?

"Why would he even turn down a chance for an interview?"

The same reason he "turned down" major film distributors and award shows.

Which is to say, he didn't. He's just making shit up.

Where is the original link? I want to post this on Twitter but honestly could do without the "Naked Spock."

Naked chiseled Spock is badass.

The movies didn't tell him to go out and shoot giffords. It, instead, reaffirmed his paranoid delusions, incited his distrust for the government through half-truths as well as outright lies, and did so for no other reason than to serve one man's fantasy. Loughner was unstable, yes, but Zeitgeist only buttressed up his worldview. And when you look at it, it was a film that took pitiful "research" and presented lies as fact. There should be a heavy weight on the film maker's conscience... assuming he has one.

Basically he was saying that Zeitgeist influenced Loughner in a way that contributed to an extremely paranoid and isolating world view.

I do not think this is an extraordinary claim. This is exactly what TZM does to people who get sucked into it.

Exhibit "A" Choppy who is your average Zeitgeist member.

http://conspiracyscience.com/forums/topic/any-fbimedia-guy-wanting-to-know-about-zeitgeist-movement-and-jared-loughner#post-26946</p>

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

http://conspiracyscience.com/forums/topic/facebook-popularity-contest-fresco-vs-merola-vs-insane-clown-posse#post-22138</p>

from choppy

I can't believe you would give credit to conspiracy science. Why would you agree with a site that says 9/11 isn't a inside job? I heard about you in TZM and from what I hear you seem like a sensible person Billll but I am beginning to see why you were banned if you won't even accept that 9/11 was a inside job. It's not your fault it's your environmental conditioning that makes you think in these ways. You are mentally ill like the rest of society and when the Zeitgeist movement reaches critical mass and begins to start the Venus Project we will at first have to recondition people like you who do not fit into society because in fact you are a danger to our planet.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX