Page By Category
Forum - Another peer review article rips Twoofers' "nanothermate" to shreds.
Tags: 9/11, September 11th, Haters gonna hate [ Add Tags ]
| [ Return to 9/11 Can | Reply to Topic ] |
| Muertos | Posted: Dec 19, 2010 - 11:51 |
| ||||
 Paid Disinformation Blogger Level: 14 CS Original | http://climateguy.blogspot.com/2010/11/peer-review-of-harrit-et-al-on-911-cant.html</p> Scientific analysis of the vanity-reviewed CT paper. Nothing we haven't seen already, but I'm posting it just in case anybody wants it in their arsenal to use against Twoofers who think Steven Jones is the second coming of Einstein. The real amusing stuff is in the comments. After this analysis that says the "evidence" for nanothermate is steel rust, a Twoofer writes: "U R A MORON!" Fair warning, though: the creator of this blog is a global warming denier, so use with caution. | |||||
| #1 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] | |||||
| Ed | Posted: Dec 19, 2010 - 14:04 |
| ||||
 Level: 10 CS Original | In addition to being a GW denier, Denis Rancourt is a strange scarce brand of truther that doesn't believe in the thermite claims or the demolition of WTC1 and 2 but believes WTC7 was demolished. I'm not sure the title of this thread gives the right impression, this is a blog written by a physicist and it is not a peer reviewed article. He is I suppose a "peer" because he is a fellow physicist, but other than that... | |||||
| #2 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] | |||||
| Muertos | Posted: Dec 19, 2010 - 15:09 |
| ||||
Paid Disinformation Blogger Level: 14 CS Original | Whoa, did I quote one Twoofer to discredit another? Major debunker faux pas. Thanks for pointing this out Ed. How can you possibly believe WTC1 & 2 were felled by Al Qaeda but that Building 7 was pulled? That's idiotic. | |||||
| #3 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] | |||||
| Ed | Posted: Dec 19, 2010 - 19:11 |
| ||||
Level: 10 CS Original | Oh I didnt say he believes they were destroyed by Al Qaeda :). You can go to his main blog here: You can find his debate with big time truther Kevin Barrett on one of the articles there, but here is a direct link: In it he speculates that there could have been 'something' on the planes themselves. Its quite interesting listening since it is rare for a truther to be both qualified and against demolitions, yet at the same time believe some of it was a demolition. A interesting titbit aside from this is that while no one seems to know who the peer reviewers on that Bentham paper were, one of them was David Griscom apparently who has been a truther for years. Steven Jones acted like he didnt know Griscom was a truther before he came out and said he was one of the reviewers, yet that is a lie as well. More information here: | |||||
| #4 | [ Top | Reply to Topic ] | |||||